Category Archives: 1MDB

SABOTAGE

1.​ I am confused by the AG’s statement that Dato Seri Khairuddin and Matthias Chang are being charged with sabotage of the nation’s banking and financial system.

2.​ I assume that their reports to the police authorities in the UK, Switzerland and Hong Kong, where the transactions took place, are the basis of these sabotage charges which if convicted may land them in jail for up to 15 years.

3.​ But the publication by the foreign press of the shenanigans in the investments by 1MDB came out long before Khairuddin reported. These news reports were not casual reports but were very detailed descriptions of what and who were involved. They were reporting on what is well known to the whole world.

4.​ Why were these newspaper reports not satisfactorily rebutted by 1MDB or the MOF since the impression created about Malaysia’s alleged abuses of the financial and banking systems could result ultimately in the loss of confidence in Malaysia’s political and economic health and its financials?

5.​ But had there been no 1MDB and no 42 billion Ringgit being borrowed, the press would not report nor would there be any police reports. Wouldn’t these press reports then be considered as sabotage?

6.​ 1MDB may sell the 60 Ringgit p.s.f. land that it bought from the Government at 5000% above the purchase price and repay the loans. But the fact remains that had 1MDB not been created, the huge sum of borrowed money would not have disappeared. For this 1MDB and those responsible must still be charged for abuses of the banking and financial system, repayment of the loans notwithstanding. The creators of 1MDB and the managers are the people who sabotaged this country, which before this had a good record for financial management and a sound banking system. They are the people who should be charged in court for sabotage of the Malaysian banking and financial systems. Since it was Najib who created 1MDB, borrow 42 billion Ringgit and invested the money and losing it, Najib should also be charged with sabotage.

7.​ Alternatively everyone, from the initial set-up of 1MDB to the borrowing, to the newspaper reporters and the reports to the police should all be charged with sabotage of Malaysia’s financial and banking systems.

VERSI BM

SABOTAJ

1. Saya keliru dengan kenyataan Peguam Negara bahawa Dato Seri Khairuddin dan Matthias Chang sedang didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem perbankan dan kewangan negara.

2. Saya menganggap bahawa laporan mereka kepada pihak berkuasa polis di UK, Switzerland dan Hong Kong, di mana urus niaga itu berlaku, adalah asas kepada caj-caj sabotaj yang jika disabitkan kesalahan boleh dikenakan hukuman penjara sehingga 15 tahun.

3. Tetapi penerbitan oleh akhbar asing mengenai tipu helah dalam pelaburan oleh 1MDB keluar lebih lama sebelum Khairuddin melaporkannya. Laporan-laporan berita ini bukan laporan sambil lewa tetapi penerangan yang sangat terperinci mengenai apa dan siapa yang terlibat. Mereka melaporkan apa yang sudah diketahui umum di seluruh dunia.

4. Kenapa laporan-laporan akhbar ini tidak disangkal dengan memuaskan oleh 1MDB atau MOF sedangkan tanggapan yang telah terujud mengenai pendakwaan penyalahgunaan sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia boleh akhirnya mengakibatkan kehilangan keyakinan terhadap kesihatan politik dan ekonomi Malaysia dan kewangannya?

5. Jika sekiranya tidak wujud 1MDB dan tiada RM42 bilion yang dipinjam, akhbar tidak akan melaporkan dan tidak akan ada laporan-laporan polis. Tidakkah laporan-laporan akhbar itu dianggap sebagai sabotaj?

6. 1MDB boleh menjual tanah yang dibeli dengan harga RM60 kaki persegi daripada Kerajaan pada kadar 5000% atas harga pembelian dan membayar balik pinjaman. Tetapi pada hakikat seandainya 1MDB tidak dicipta, jumlah besar wang yang dipinjam itu tidak akan lesap. Untuk ini 1MDB dan mereka yang bertanggungjawab masih perlu didakwa kerana penyalahgunaan sistem perbankan dan kewangan, tidak terkecuali juga pembayaran balik pinjaman. Pencipta 1MDB dan pengurus-pengurusnya adalah mereka yang mensabotaj negara ini, yang sebelum ini mempunyai rekod yang baik bagi pengurusan kewangan dan sistem perbankan yang kukuh. Mereka adalah orang-orang yang patut didakwa di mahkamah kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia. Oleh sebab Najiblah yang mencipta 1MDB, meminjam RM42 bilion, melabur wang itu dan menghilangkannya, Najib juga sepatutnya didakwa kerana sabotaj.

7. Atau sebagai alternatif semua orang, dari awal penubuhan 1MDB hingga pinjamannya, pemberita-pemberita akhbar dan laporan kepada polis, semuanya harus didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia.

SEPARATION OF POWERS

1. The Deputy Prime Minister made reference to the separation of power when commenting on the statement of the Rulers over the need for investigations on 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account to be expedited. Is this a breach of the assumed separation of powers between the Rulers and the Government?

2. It is true that the Agong and the Malay Rulers are constitutional monarchs. But that does not mean that they are just rubber stamps to validate all the acts of their governments.

3. Sec 39 of the Federal Constitution (State constitutions follow closely that of the Federal constitution) states clearly that “The executive authority of the Federation shall be vested in the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and exercisable, subject to the provision of any Federal law and of the Second Schedule, by him or any Minister authorised by the Cabinet, but the Parliament may by law confer executive functions on other persons.

4. Section 40 states clearly that the Agong shall be entitled, at his request to any information available to the Cabinet.

5. These two sections clearly gives the Yang di-Pertuan Agong some executive roles.

6. Section 40 para (2) clearly states the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may act in his discretion in the performance of;

a) the appointment of the Prime Minister

b) the withholding of consent to a request for dissolution of Parliament

c) Federal law may make provisions for requiring the Agong to act after consultation with or on the recommendation of any person or body of persons

7. In the recent past we have seen Rulers rejecting nominees by the majority party for the office of Menteri Besar.

8. Should the Prime Minister request for the dissolution of Parliament, the Agong may reject.

9. Again we see here that the Agong and the Rulers may act on their own discretion. They may also consult and accept recommendations of any person or body of persons.

10. Obviously if petitions are made or there is a public clamour, the rulers may not have to listen only to the Cabinet.

11. Section 41 unequivocally states that the Yang di- Pertuan Agong shall be the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Federation. Clearly it is not just the privilege of wearing the uniform.

12. What is clear is that nothing in the Constitution talks about the separation of power between the Government and the Agong. In fact in many instances the Agong may act at his own discretion.

13. And the Agong may listen to other people than the Cabinet. This is only as it should be as failure of the Cabinet to address complaints by the people may require the Agong and the Rulers to urge the Government to respond.

14. In making their statement the Rulers were not in any way exceeding the provisions of the constitution. They were in fact abiding by the provisions of the constitution.

15. On the other hand the same cannot be said regarding the principle of the separation of powers between the legislative, the executive and the judiciary.

16. Currently the Prime Minister as head of the elected legislators is clearly not respecting these principles.

17. For example officers of the administration who were investigating 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit account have been transferred out to the Prime Minister’s Office, resulting in their stopping their work. Their replacements apparently was with approvals of the Prime Minister.

18. Officers of the MACC have been similarly treated, again resulting in the investigations being obstructed.

19. The Attorney-General, a member of the judicial establishment have been removed while he was carrying out the task of preparing the said case for the courts. In his place a judge was transferred to take over as AG. This is actually usurping the powers of the judiciary.

20. The AG was said to be sick, but he denied he was sick. As far as is known no medical certificate certifying that he was sick seem to have been issued.

21. All these are public knowledge. The Rulers may have heard and probably received petitions on the authoritarian disregard for the law and rules of Government.

22. The citizens of this country are the subjects of the Rulers. As Rulers they must care for the welfare of the people.

23. If in their opinion the Government should allow expeditious investigations to be carried over the issues of concern to the people and the country it is the duty of the Ruler to make known to the Government the dissatisfaction of the people over the issue and to ask for the matter to be attended to.

VERSI BM
PENGASINGAN KUASA

1. Timbalan Perdana Menteri merujuk kepada pengasingan kuasa apabila mengulas kenyataan Raja-Raja mengenai keperluan mempercepatkan penyiasatan ke atas 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib. Adakah ini satu pelanggaran pengasingan kuasa yang diandaikan antara Raja-Raja dan Kerajaan?

2. Ianya benar bahawa Agong dan Raja-Raja Melayu adalah raja berperlembagaan. Tetapi itu tidak bermakna bahawa mereka adalah pak turut semata-mata untuk mengesahkan semua tindakan Kerajaan.

3. Perkara 39 Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Perlembagaan Negeri mengikuti Perlembagaan Persekutuan) menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa “Kuasa Eksekutif Persekutuan hendaklah terletak kepada Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan, tertakluk kepada peruntukan mana-mana Undang-Undang Persekutuan dan peruntukan Jadual Kedua, dijalankan olehnya atau mana-mana Menteri yang diberi kuasa oleh Jemaah Menteri, tetapi Parlimen boleh, melalui undang-undang, memberikan fungsi eksekutif kepada individu lain.”

4. Perkara 40 menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa Agong adalah berhak, atas permintaannya, mendapat segala maklumat yang ada kepada Kabinet.

5. Kedua-dua bahagian ini jelas memberikan Yang di-Pertuan Agong beberapa peranan eksekutif.

6. Perkara 40 Peranggan (2) jelas menyatakan Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak menurut budi bicaranya dalam melaksanakan fungsi:

a) melantik seorang Perdana Menteri

b) tidak memperkenankan permintaan bagi pembubaran Parlimen

c) Undang-Undang Persekutuan boleh membuat peruntukan bagi mengkehendaki Agong bertindak selepas berunding dengan atau atas cadangan mana-mana individu atau sekumpulan individu.

7. Pada kebelakangan ini, kita melihat Raja-Raja telah menolak pencalonan oleh parti majoriti bagi jawatan Menteri Besar.

8. Sekiranya Perdana Menteri meminta untuk membubarkan Parlimen, Agong boleh menolak.

9. Sekali lagi kita lihat di sini bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja-Raja boleh bertindak atas budi bicara mereka sendiri. Mereka juga boleh berunding dan menerima cadangan daripada mana-mana individu atau kumpulan individu.

10. Jelas sekali jika petisyen telah dibuat atau ada suara desakan ramai, Raja-Raja tidak perlu hanya mendengar Kabinet.

11. Seksyen 41 tanpa ragu-ragu menyatakan bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong hendaklah menjadi Pemerintah Tertinggi Angkatan Tentera Persekutuan. Jelas sekali ini bukan sahaja hak istimewa untuk pemakaian seragam tersebut.

12. Apa yang jelas ialah tiada apa jua dalam Perlembagaan yang bercakap mengenai pengasingan kuasa di antara Kerajaan dan Agong. Malah dalam kebanyakkan keadaan, Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak mengikut budi bicara sendiri.

13. Dan Agong boleh mendengar individu selain daripada Kabinet. Inilah sebenar hakikat yang diharapkan kerana kegagalan Kabinet untuk menangani aduan rakyat memerlukan Agong dan Raja-Raja menggesa Kerajaan untuk bertindak balas.

14. Dalam membuat kenyataan mereka, Raja-Raja tidak berada dalam keadaan melebihi had peruntukan Perlembagaan. Mereka sebenarnya mematuhi peruntukan perlembagaan.

15. Sebaliknya, yang sama tidak boleh dikatakan mengenai prinsip pengasingan kuasa antara perundangan, eksekutif dan kehakiman.

16. Pada masa ini, Perdana Menteri, sebagai ketua penggubal undang-undang yang dipilih, secara jelas tidak menghormati prinsip-prinsip ini.

17. Sebagai contoh pegawai-pegawai pentadbiran yang sedang menyiasat 1MDB dan akaun RM2.6 bilion telah dipindahkan ke Jabatan Perdana Menteri, menyebabkan pemberhentian kerja mereka. Penggantian mereka adalah ketara dengan kelulusan Perdana Menteri.

18. Pegawai-pegawai SPRM telah diberi layanan yang sama, sekali lagi menyebabkan siasatan terhalang.

19. Peguam Negara, seorang ahli badan kehakiman telah disingkirkan ketika beliau menjalankan tugas menyediakan kes tersebut untuk mahkamah. Di tempat beliau seorang hakim telah dipindahkan untuk mengambil alih tugas sebagai Peguam Negara. Ini sebenarnya perampasan kuasa badan kehakiman.

20. Peguam Negara dikatakan sakit, tetapi dia menafikan dirinya sakit. Setakat yang diketahui, tiada sijil perubatan yang mengesahkan bahawa dia sakit telah dikeluarkan.

21. Semua ini adalah pengetahuan umum. Raja-Raja mungkin pernah mendengar dan mungkin juga menerima petisyen mengenai sikap pengabaian secara authoritarian undang-undang dan peraturan Kerajaan.

22. Rakyat negara ini adalah subjek Raja-Raja. Sebagai Raja-Raja mereka perlu menjaga kebajikan rakyat.

23. Jika pada pendapat mereka, Kerajaan perlu membenarkan siasatan cepat dan cekap dijalankan ke atas isu-isu yang penting kepada rakyat dan negara ini, adalah kewajipan Raja untuk memaklumkan kepada Kerajaan rasa tidak puas hati rakyat dengan isu ini dan meminta perkara ini diberi perhatian.

1 MDB CLEARED

1. The Attorney Generals Chambers have cleared 1MDB of any wrongdoings with regard to the use of the funds approved by Bank Negara for foreign investments.

2. But Bank Negara is obviously not satisfied and appealed to the AG without any change in the report. Again the AG rejected the appeal.

3. We know of course that the AG is empowered to decide whether a case should go to court or not. The presumption is that the AG would appreciate and understand the seriousness or otherwise of the case before him, that he would appreciate the concern of the complainant or agency making the report, that if there is dissatisfaction the case should be judged in a court of law by a judge and if still dissatisfied that an appeal be allowed.

4. That should be the way. But it would seem that the AG has made the judgement, rejecting the case as having no merit for a hearing in a court of law. And when an appeal is made, the appeal is dismissed by him on grounds which are not clear. There is a lack of transparency here.

5. Is this the rule of law that this country is supposed to uphold? Is the AG higher than a judge, that his judgement is final and there can be no appeal?

Continue reading 1 MDB CLEARED

NO CONFIDENCE VOTE

1. I read a report that the Speaker of Dewan Rakyat will not allow a motion of non-confidence to be tabled in the Dewan by anyone.

2. He insists that only he can decide whether such a motion can be put before the house or not.

3. The reason he says is that Parliamentary standing orders are silent on this matter. Also it had never been done before.

4. True, it had never been done before. That was because none of the previous five Prime Ministers had 2.6 billion Ringgit in their personal accounts, nor have they been involved in financial scandals and the alleged murder of anyone.

5. None of the previous Prime Ministers had dismantled the institutions investigating into the origins and whereabout of the money they had.

6. None of the previous Prime Ministers had borrowed RM42 billion at high cost to set up a development fund which became involved in shady deals.

7. None of them had invested more than one billion USD in dubious joint-venture projects with equally dubious Arab companies.

8. None of them had dissolved the joint-venture company only 6 months after formation and converted the 1MDB capital into loan with the partner they don’t think they should continue to have the joint-venture with.

9. But Najib is involved in all these. And now, other than saying the 1MDB assets are worth more than the 42 billion Ringgit borrowed, he cannot prove where the money is. The assets are actually Government land which Najib allowed 1MDB to acquire at ridiculously low prices, and then revalued 500 times more.

10. A vote of non-confidence is totally democratic. Parliament may not have any provision for it but the Constitution, the supreme law of the country clearly states that if the Prime Minister no longer commands the support of the majority of the members of Parliaments, he should resign. Article 43 (4) of the Federal Constitution states “If the Prime Minister ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House of Representatives, then, unless at his request the Yang di-Pertuan Agong dissolves Parliament, the Prime Minister shall tender the resignation of the Cabinet”.

11. So, is the Speaker trying to ignore the constitution?

12. Today, if you go abroad, foreigners, especially their press will ask, “Hey, what is happening to your country?” You will feel ashamed, but you can do nothing about it. The people who can do something are totally without shame. They openly admit to having received money by the millions from the Prime Minister. This is corruption at its worst. They support the PM because he gave them money, money which he cannot explain with any credibility that he obtained legally.

13. No wonder Malaysia is now listed as among the top of the corrupt countries of the world. And now the supporters of the Government do not even respect the Constitution.

14. No vote of non-confidence because the speaker will not allow it.

VERSI BM
Undi Tidak Percaya

1. Saya membaca laporan bahawa Yang di-Pertua Dewan Rakyat tidak akan membenarkan usul undi tidak percaya dibentangkan di Dewan oleh sesiapa pun.

2. Beliau menegaskan bahawa hanya dia boleh membuat keputusan sama ada usul boleh dibentangkan di dalam Dewan itu atau tidak.

3. Beliau berkata sebabnya ialah kerana perintah tetap (standing order) Parlimen bisu mengenai perkara ini. Juga ia tidak pernah dilakukan sebelum ini.

4. Benar, ia tidak pernah dilakukan sebelum ini. Ini adalah kerana tiada seorang pun daripada lima Perdana Menteri sebelum ini mempunyai 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun peribadi mereka, dan tiada pula mereka terlibat dalam skandal kewangan dan tuduhan pembunuhan sesiapa.

5. Tidak ada seorang daripada Perdana Menteri sebelum ini telah membongkarkan institusi-institusi penyiasat asal-usul dan di mana adanya wang yang mereka miliki.

6. Tidak ada seorang daripada Perdana Menteri sebelum ini meminjam RM42 bilion pada kos yang tinggi untuk menubuhkan dana pembangunan yang terlibat dalam urus niaga yang curigakan.

7. Tiada seorang pun daripada mereka telah melabur lebih satu bilion USD dalam projek usaha sama dengan syarikat-syarikat Arab yang kredibilitinya juga meragukan.

8. Tiada seorang pun daripada mereka telah membubarkan syarikat usaha sama hanya 6 bulan selepas pembentukan dan menukar modal 1MDB menjadi pinjaman dengan pasangan usaha sama itu yang mereka fikir tidak perlu lagi teruskan usaha sama itu.

9. Tetapi Najib terlibat dalam semua ini. Dan kini, selain daripada berkata aset 1MDB bernilai lebih daripada 42 bilion Ringgit yang dipinjam, dia tidak dapat membuktikan di mana wang itu berada. Aset ini adalah sebenarnya tanah Kerajaan yang Najib membenarkan 1MDB mengambil alih pada harga yang amat murah, dan kemudian dinilai semula lebih 500 kali ganda.

10. Suatu undi tidak percaya benar-benar demokratik. Parlimen mungkin tidak mempunyai apa-apa peruntukan untuk itu tetapi Perlembagaan, undang-undang tertinggi di negara ini dengan jelas menyatakan bahawa jika Perdana Menteri tidak lagi mendapat sokongan daripada majoriti ahli-ahli Parlimen, beliau harus meletakkan jawatan. Perkara 43 (4) Perlembagaan Persekutuan menyatakan “Jika Perdana Menteri tidak lagi mendapat kepercayaan majoriti ahli-ahli Dewan Rakyat, maka, melainkan jika atas permintaannya Yang di-Pertuan Agong membubarkan Parlimen, Perdana Menteri hendaklah menawar perletakan jawatan keseluruhan Kabinet “.

11. Jadi, adakah Yang di-Pertua Dewan cuba mengabaikan perlembagaan?

12. Hari ini, jika anda pergi ke luar negara, warga asing, terutama akhbar mereka akan bertanya, “Hai, apa yang berlaku kepada negara anda?” Anda akan berasa malu, tetapi anda tidak boleh berbuat apa-apa mengenainya. Mereka yang boleh melakukan sesuatu langsung tidak berasa malu. Mereka secara terbuka mengaku telah menerima jutaan wang daripada Perdana Menteri. Ini adalah rasuah pada peringkat paling teruk. Mereka menyokong PM kerana dia memberikan mereka wang, wang yang beliau sendiri tidak dapat menjelaskan dengan sebarang kredibiliti yang ianya diperolehi secara sah.

13. Tidak hairanlah Malaysia kini disenaraikan sebagai antara negara-negara korup di dunia. Dan kini penyokong kerajaan tidak langsung menghormati Perlembagaan.

14. Tiada undi tidak percaya kerana Yang di-Pertuan Dewan tidak akan membenarkannya.

NAJIB

1. I had worked hard to make Najib the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

2. But now I want him to be removed, to step down from being Prime Minister.

3. It is nothing personal.

4. It is because he has failed terribly as Prime Minister.

5. Very early I noted the wrong things he was doing.

6. We have been independent since 1957. We should be able to run our own country by ourself. Indeed we had been doing so for decades before Najib, and we did very well.

7. But Najib appointed several British officers as his advisers.

8. Najib appointed many foreign consultants to advise him on running the country.

9. These people cost billions of Ringgits but their advise were generally not good for the country. They knew nothing about the politics, economics and sensitivities of Malaysia. As a result the development of Malaysia has slowed down and the races are at each others throats.

10. Najib’s Government became extremely unpopular. Despite giving lots of money to the people, they rejected him in the elections of 2013. He performed worse than Abdullah, who was also rejected by the people. The Chinese rejected him totally despite his declaring himself to be their brother.

11. He antagonised the civil servants by setting up Pemandu to take over the job of the EPU. Pemandu non-Government personnel were paid very high salaries, far above the Government Salary Scheme. So annoyed were the Civil servants that a few, upon retirement joined the opposition party and stood as opposition candidates, something which never happened before.

12. The growth of the economy fell below those of the Philippines and Indonesia.

13. The currency depreciated and share prices went down badly creating problems for businesses, importers and exporters. The cost of living went up especially after the GST.

14. Then came the 1MDB scandal. A totally unnecessary fund was created which was to be financed by huge borrowings. The Government gave one million Ringgit as capital but 1MDB (1 Malaysia Development Berhad) borrowed 42 billion Ringgit from the market. It paid high interest of 5.9% and gave 10% commission to Goldman Sachs. Government never borrowed so much or paid such high rates.

15. 1MDB bought electric power plants at higher than market price. It also bought the debts of the power companies. Total cost was 18 billion Ringgit. 1 MDB lost so much money that it cannot pay the interest on the loans.

16. 1MDB bought Government land at 60 Ringgit per square foot when the real price is over RM3000 psf. Revaluing the land by 50 times, it claims its asset is bigger than its debts. This is like selling Approved Permits obtained free from the Government.

17. Then 1MDB entered into shady business with Petro Saudi as JV partner. It paid USD 1 Billion for its 40% share. Six months, later the JV was dissolved. But the USD 1 Billion together with another 700 million USD were converted to a loan to Petro Saudi. The money has now disappeared.

18. The only assets that 1MDB has are the power plants and the land in Kuala Lumpur. More than RM20 Billion of the 42 billion Ringgit cannot be traced or accounted for.

19. Then suddenly the Wall Street Journal reported that Najib had in his private account at the Arab Malaysian Bank USD700 million (amounting to RM2.6 billion at that time)

20. No PM of Malaysia or UMNO President can have that much money. All donations to UMNO are normally received and banked by the UMNO Treasurer. All assets are placed under the name of three trustees.

21. Never in the history of UMNO had there been more than RM250 million in cash. All other assets are in the form of shares, land and buildings. The President is duty-bound to hand over all donations to the treasurer for banking. The President never had UMNO money or money donated to UMNO for elections for example in his private account. There is no provision for UMNO accounts to be operated by the President.

22. Najib and his wife are well-known for a lavish life-style. Obviously millions were spent on the betrothal and numerous wedding ceremonies in Malaysia and Kazakhstan. Najib’s step-son spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying property in London, New York and California. He also financed the production of a Hollywood movie, “The Wolf of Wall Street” with over 100 million US Dollars.

23. On Najib’s salary as Prime Minister, it is impossible for him to spend millions on all these. A statement by the PMO claimed that the money for the foreign properties and film was inherited. It is impossible for Tun Razak, or Haji Noah or Rosmah’s father to have and leave hundreds of millions of Ringgit. They were not even known as millionaires. Najib’s brothers refuted the claim.

24. So where did the money come from. Najib claims the 2.6 billion Ringgit was donated to him by an Arab. This is ridiculous. Nobody ever gives that amount of money to anyone. And Najib cannot prove that the Arab had given the money.

25. And so a special task force consisting of the A.G, the Anti Corruption
Commissioner, the Governor of Bank Negara and the Inspector-General of Police was set up to investigate the source of the RM 2.6 billion in Najib’s private account at The Arab Malaysian Bank.

26. The Public Accounts Committee of the Dewan Rakyat was also investigating what happened to the RM 42 billion Ringgit borrowed by 1MDB. So was the Auditor General.

27. Suddenly Najib sacked the Attorney-General claiming he was sick. The A.G denied he was sick. There was no certificate by doctors to prove he was sick. Najib had no right to claim that the A.G was sick.

28. At the same time the head of the Anti-Corruption Commission was said to have gone on leave. The Governor of Bank Negara was silent. Later she stated she was afraid of being arrested.

29. Two of the Government members of the PAC were made deputy ministers and another two given other jobs. They could not carry on their work as PAC members. The PAC was without a Chairman and its investigation of 1MDB has stopped.

30. Two members of the Anti-Corruption Commission were arrested, released and transferred to the PM’s office. After complaints were made they were transferred back to the Commission.

31. The assistant head of the Special Branch was transferred out. He then made a strong statement against his transfer.

32. People who spoke about 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account, or reported on it were arrested, have their passports confiscated and threatened by the police with questioning. It seems that any question about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion constitute acts to undermine democracy and to topple a properly elected Government. People can be detained for up to 28 days without trial under a new law which is meant for acts of terrorism. Talking about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion seems to constitute acts of terrorism. Najib forgets that he was involved in the removal of his predecessor who was also elected democratically.

33. Then came a bombshell. Al Jazeera screened the story of the murder of the Mongolian girl Altantuya. It was clear from the story that Najib has something to do with the murder.

34. Many Malaysians refuse to believe it. But people all over the world believe the story. It has become an international scandal. It has brought shame to Malaysia. Everywhere one goes, one is asked, “What has happened to Malaysia”.

35. Between 1MDB, the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s private account and the murder of Altantuya, Malaysia’s good name has been totally blackened. Never before has Malaysia become so disgraced by its own Prime Minister. Never before have people looked down upon this country. Never before have Malaysians been so ashamed of their country.

36. Najib has paid people to demonstrate in the streets in support of him. He has of course made it illegal for people to demonstrate for his removal.

37. If the currency and the economy is to recover, Najib must cease to be Prime Minister of Malaysia. Malaysians must demand for Najib’s removal. It is totally democratic to demand for his removal. The actions he has taken to detain people for holding rallies to demand for his removal is what is undemocratic and against the laws of this country.

38. I call upon all Malaysians to demand that Najib allows the investigation against him to be carried out by independent people not appointed by him. Najib must allow due legal process to go on. If it is found that he had done illegal things he should be made to resign.

39. Only his ceasing to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia will the economy recover, the Ringgit revalued up, and cost of living go down. Only after his removal can Malaysians stand tall again.

VERSI BM
1. Saya telah bekerja keras untuk menjadikan Najib Perdana Menteri Malaysia.

2. Tetapi sekarang saya mahu dia disingkirkan, meletak jawatan daripada menjadi Perdana Menteri.

3. Ia bukan hal peribadi.

4. Ia adalah kerana dia telah gagal teruk sebagai Perdana Menteri.

5. Daripada awal lagi saya perhatikan perkara-perkara salah yang dia lakukan.

6. Kita telah merdeka semenjak 1957. Kita sepatutnya dapat mentadbir negara kita sendiri. Sesungguhnya kita telah pun berbuat demikian selama beberapa dekad sebelum Najib, dan kita telah melakukannya dengan cemerlang.

7. Tetapi Najib melantik beberapa pegawai British sebagai penasihatnya.

8. Najib telah melantik ramai perunding asing untuk menasihatinya bagaimana mentadbir negara.

9. Orang-orang ini melibatkan kos berbilion-bilion ringgit tetapi nasihat mereka secara amnya tidak baik untuk negara ini. Mereka tidak tahu apa-apa tentang politik, ekonomi dan sensitivi Malaysia. Akibatnya pembangunan Malaysia lembab dan bangsa-bangsa berada dalam keadaan menentang satu sama lain.

10. Kerajaan di bawah pimpinan Najib menjadi sangat tidak popular. Walaupun memberi banyak wang kepada rakyat, mereka menolak beliau dalam Pilihan Raya 2013. Prestasi beliau lebih buruk daripada Abdullah, yang juga telah ditolak oleh rakyat. Orang Cina menolaknya sama sekali walaupun beliau mengisytiharkan dirinya sebagai saudara mereka.

11. Dia menimbulkan kemarahan kakitangan awam dengan menubuhkan Pemandu untuk mengambil alih tugas EPU. Kakitangan Pemandu yang bukannya pegawai Kerajaan telah dibayar gaji yang tinggi, jauh lebih tinggi mengatasi Skim Gaji Kerajaan. Begitu marah, sebilangan pejawat awam sebaik sahaja bersara mereka telah menyertai parti pembangkang dan bertanding sebagai calon pembangkang, sesuatu yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelum ini.

12. Pertumbuhan ekonomi jatuh di bawah paras pertumbuhan ekonomi Filipina dan Indonesia.

13. Mata wang telah susut dan harga saham susut dengan teruk mengakibatkan masalah untuk perniagaan, pengimport dan pengeksport. Kos sara hidup meningkat terutama selepas GST.

14. Kemudian datangnya pula skandal 1MDB. Suatu dana yang sama sekali tidak perlu telah diwujudkan yang akan dibiayai oleh pinjaman yang besar. Kerajaan telah memberi satu juta Ringgit sebagai modal tetapi 1MDB (1Malaysia Development Berhad) telah meminjam 42 bilion Ringgit daripada pasaran. Ia membayar faedah yang tinggi sebanyak 5.9% dan memberikan komisen 10% kepada Goldman Sachs. Kerajaan tidak pernah meminjam begitu banyak atau membayar kadar yang begitu tinggi itu.

15. 1MDB membeli loji kuasa elektrik pada harga lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran. Ia juga membeli/mengambilalih hutang piutang syarikat-syarikat janakuasa. Jumlah kos adalah 18 bilion Ringgit. 1MDB kehilangan begitu banyak wang sehingga ia tidak boleh membayar faedah ke atas pinjaman.

16. 1MDB membeli tanah Kerajaan pada 60 Ringgit kaki persegi sedangkan harga sebenarnya adalah lebih daripada RM3,000 kaki persegi. Dengan menilai semula tanah itu sebanyak 50 kali ganda, ia mendakwa asetnya adalah lebih besar daripada hutangnya. Ini adalah seperti menjual permit import yang didapati secara percuma daripada Kerajaan.

17. Kemudian 1MDB telah menyertai perniagaan yang mencurigakan dengan Petro Saudi sebagai rakan usaha sama. Ia membayar USD1 Bilion bagi saham 40 peratus miliknya itu. Enam bulan kemudian usaha sama ini telah dibubarkan. Akan tetapi USD1 Bilion itu bersama dengan USD700 juta yang lain telah ditukar menjadi pinjaman kepada Petro Saudi. Wang ini kini telah lesap.

18. Satu-satunya aset yang dipunyai oleh 1MDB sekarang adalah loji kuasa dan tanah di Kuala Lumpur. Lebih daripada RM20 Bilion daripada 42 Bilion ringgit itu tidak dapat dikesan atau dihitung.

19. Kemudian tiba-tiba Wall Street Journal melaporkan bahawa Najib mempunyai USD700 juta dalam akaun peribadinya di Bank Arab-Malaysia (bersamaan RM2.6 bilion pada masa itu).

20. Tidak ada PM Malaysia atau Presiden UMNO yang boleh mempunyai wang sebanyak itu. Semua sumbangan kepada UMNO biasanya diterima dan dibankkan oleh Bendahari UMNO. Semua aset diletakkan di bawah nama tiga pemegang amanah.

21. Tidak pernah dalam sejarah UMNO terdapat lebih daripada RM250 juta secara tunai. Semua aset lain adalah dalam bentuk saham, tanah dan bangunan. Presiden adalah bertanggungjawab untuk menyerahkan semua sumbangan kepada Bendahari untuk perbankan. Presiden tidak pernah menyimpan wang UMNO atau wang didermakan kepada UMNO, untuk pilihan raya misalnya, di dalam akaun peribadinya. Tiada peruntukan untuk akaun UMNO dikendalikan oleh Presiden.

22. Najib dan isterinya terkenal dengan gaya hidup yang mewah. Jelas sekali jutaan telah dibelanjakan untuk pertunangan dan pelbagai majlis perkahwinan di Malaysia dan Kazakhstan. Anak tiri Najib membelanjakan ratusan juta dolar membeli hartanah di London, New York dan California. Beliau juga membiayai pembikinan filem Hollywood, “The Wolf of Wall Street” dengan perbelanjaan melebihi USD100 juta.

23. Dengan gaji Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri, adalah mustahil baginya untuk membelanjakan jutaan ringgit bagi semua ini. Ada satu kenyataan oleh PMO yang mendakwa bahawa wang bagi harta-harta luar negara dan filem itu telah diwarisi. Adalah mustahil bagi Tun Razak, atau Haji Noah atau bapa Rosmah untuk memiliki dan mewariskan ratusan juta Ringgit. Malah mereka tidak dikenali sebagai jutawan pun. Adik beradik Najib menafikan dakwaan itu.

24. Jadi dari mana datangnya wang itu? Najib mendakwa 2.6 bilion Ringgit itu telah didermakan kepadanya oleh seorang Arab. Ini tidak masuk akal. Tiada siapa yang pernah memberikan wang sebanyak itu kepada sesiapa. Dan Najib tidak dapat membuktikan bahawa orang Arab itu telah memberinya wang.

25. Dan dengan itu sebuah pasukan petugas khas yang terdiri daripada Peguam Negara, Pesuruhjaya Pencegahan Rasuah, Gabenor Bank Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara telah ditubuhkan untuk menyiasat punca RM2.6 bilion berada dalam akaun peribadi Najib di Bank Arab-Malaysia.

26. Jawatankuasa Kira-Kira Dewan Rakyat juga sedang menyiasat apa yang berlaku kepada RM 42 bilion Ringgit yang dipinjam oleh 1MDB. Begitu juga Ketua Audit Negara.

27. Tiba-tiba Najib memecat Peguam Negara dengan mendakwa dia sakit. Peguam Negara menafikan beliau sakit. Tidak ada sijil oleh doktor membuktikan dia sakit. Najib tidak mempunyai hak untuk mendakwa bahawa Peguam Negara sedang sakit.

28. Pada masa yang sama, ketua Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah dikatakan telah pergi bercuti. Gabenor Bank Negara membisu. Kemudian dia menyatakan dia takut ditangkap.

29. Dua daripada ahli-ahli Kerajaan PAC dilantik Timbalan Menteri dan dua lagi diberi pekerjaan lain. Mereka tidak dapat meneruskan kerja-kerja mereka sebagai ahli PAC. PAC adalah tanpa seorang Pengerusi dan siasatan 1MDB telah berhenti.

30. Dua anggota Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah telah ditangkap, dibebaskan dan dipindahkan ke Pejabat Perdana Menteri. Selepas komplen dibuat mereka telah dipindahkan semula ke Suruhanjaya.

31. Penolong Ketua Cawangan Khas telah dipindahkan keluar. Beliau kemudian membuat kenyataan yang keras terhadap pemindahannya.

32. Orang yang bercakap mengenai 1MDB dan 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun Najib, atau melaporkan mengenainya telah ditangkap, pasport mereka dirampas dan diancam oleh polis dengan soal siasat. Ianya seolah-olah sebarang soalan mengenai 1MDB dan Najib 2.6 bilion merupakan tindakan untuk melemahkan demokrasi dan menjatuhkan Kerajaan yang dipilih dengan betul. Orang boleh ditahan sehingga 28 hari tanpa perbicaraan di bawah undang-undang baru yang bertujuan untuk mencegah tindakan keganasan. Bercakap tentang 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion kepunyaan Najib seolah-olah merupakan tindakan keganasan. Najib lupa bahawa beliau sendiri terlibat dalam penyingkiran pemimpin terdahulu yang juga dipilih secara demokrasi.

33. Kemudian datangnya sesuatu yang menggemparkan. Al Jazeera menayangkan kisah pembunuhan gadis Mongolia Altantuya. Adalah jelas daripada kisah itu bahawa Najib mempunyai kaitan dengan pembunuhan itu.

34. Ramai rakyat Malaysia tidak mahu mempercayainya. Tetapi orang di seluruh dunia mempercayai cerita itu. Ia telah menjadi satu skandal antarabangsa. Ia telah memalukan Malaysia. Di mana-mana sahaja sesiapa pergi, ada yang bertanya, “Apa yang telah berlaku kepada Malaysia”.

35. Di antara 1MDB, 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun peribadi Najib dan pembunuhan Altantuya, nama baik Malaysia benar-benar rosak. Tidak pernah sebelum ini, Malaysia menjadi begitu hina oleh Perdana Menterinya sendiri. Tidak pernah orang memandang rendah negara ini. Tidak pernah sebelum ini rakyat Malaysia begitu malu dengan negara mereka.

36. Najib telah membayar orang untuk menunjuk perasaan di jalan-jalan untuk menyokong beliau. Dengan sewenangnya beliau juga mengharamkan usaha orang-orang tunjuk perasaan bagi memecatnya.

37. Untuk mata wang dan ekonomi pulih, Najib mesti berhenti menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Rakyat Malaysia mesti menuntut penyingkiran Najib. Ianya sesuatu yang amat demokratik untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau. Tindakan yang diambil beliau untuk menahan seseorang untuk mengadakan perhimpunan untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau adalah apa yang tidak demokratik dan bercanggah dengan undang-undang negara ini.

38. Saya menyeru semua rakyat Malaysia untuk menuntut Najib membenarkan siasatan terhadapnya yang akan dijalankan oleh orang-orang bebas yang tidak dilantik olehnya. Najib mesti membenarkan proses undang-undang berjalan. Jika didapati bahawa dia telah melakukan kesalahan dia perlu didesak untuk
meletakkan jawatan.

39. Hanya dengan pengundurannya sebagai Perdana Menteri Malaysia barulah ekonomi akan pulih, nilai ringgit akan meningkat, dan kos sara hidup akan turun. Hanya selepas penyingkirannya rakyat Malaysia akan mampu berdiri semula.

Al-JAZEERA

1. Najib’s Government claims that Al-Jazeera is trying to subvert his Government with the half-hour documentary on murder in Malaysia. It claims there is no truth in the report.

2. If the Government thinks there is no truth in the documentary, then it should sue Al-Jazeera for defamation.

3. Al-Jazeera is watched by millions throughout the world. Most will believe what they see. Merely saying that it is not true may convince some Malaysians but will not convince foreigners.

Continue reading Al-JAZEERA

BERSIH

1. Saya hadir dalam tunjuk perasaan anjuran Bersih pada 29-30 Ogos. Ramai yang tertanya-tanya apakah saya sudah jadi penyokong Bersih. Apakah saya sokong parti lawan DAP dan Kit Siang. Ada juga yang bertanya saya sudah
memihak kepada orang Cina.

2. Saya pernah menyatakan demonstrasi jalanan tidak harus diguna untuk tekanan politik kerana ia menjejaskan perniagaan terutama perniagaan kecil dan ekonomi Negara. Apakah sekarang perbuatan saya tidak menunjuk sifat berdolak-dalik dalam politik.

3. Saya tidak setuju dengan tunjuk perasaan kerana ada saluran lain yang boleh digunakan untuk menekan Kerajaan apabila menyalahguna kuasa.

4. Kita boleh buat laporan polis, dengan harapan polis dan Pendakwa Raya akan ambil tindakan, menghadapkan pihak yang dituduh ke mahkamah.

5. Tetapi sekarang Najib sudah bubar dan musnahkan institusi-institusi Kerajaan yang ditugas untuk melindungi hak rakyat.

6. Apabila dituduh telah lesapkan duit Kerajaan melalui 1MDB, Najib serah siasatan kepada Ketua Audit Negara dan Jawatankuasa Kira-kira Wang Negara (PAC – Public Accounts Committee) Dewan Rakyat. Rakyat disuruh tunggu sehingga siasatan oleh badan-badan ini selesai.

7. Apabila wang sebanyak RM2.6 bilion terdapat dalam akaun peribadi Najib, dan dia tak dapat menafi duit ini ada dalam akaunnya, dan ramai bertanya daripada mana duit ini datang, dan penjelasan yang munasabah tidak dapat diberi oleh Najib, maka satu pasukan bertugas (task force) dibentuk untuk secara rasmi menyelidik wang ini.

8. Pasukan ini terdiri daripada Pendakwa Raya, Ketua Polis Negara, Ketua Badan Pencegah Rasuah dan Gabenor Bank.

9. Rakyat menunggu hasil siasatan ini. Tiba-tiba Pendakwa Raya disingkir oleh Najib, Ketua Badan Pencegah Rasuah diarah bercuti, dan Gabenor Bank diugut kononnya kerana Bank Negara bocor maklumat. Dan terhentilah siasatan oleh badan ini.

10. Di masa yang sama Pengerusi PAC dan tiga lagi ahli diberi jawatan dalam Kerajaan dan siasatan berkenaan wang 1MDB oleh PAC pun dihentikan.

11. Beberapa pegawai polis dan lain-lain pegawai dipindah ke jawatan lain supaya tidak lagi dapat meneruskan siasatan.

12. Yang ditinggal dan yang baru dilantik adalah orang yang tidak tunjuk minat untuk membuat siasatan, bahkan sengaja menghalang apa-apa siasatan terhadap 1MDB dan duit RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib.

13. Semua saluran untuk menyiasat 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib sudah tidak lagi ada.

14. Sebaliknya Najib dan konco-konconya sering mendakwa duit RM2.6 bilion adalah derma. Tidak pula diperkenalkan penderma, punca kekayaannya, bentuk wang yang diberi, bank yang terlibat dan lain-lain butiran. Sebenarnya dakwaan ini tidak boleh diterima akal.

15. Kepada pemimpin UMNO Najib mendakwa bahawa RM2.6 bilion ini adalah untuk pilihanraya ke-14. Jika untuk parti belanja membeli nasi lemak atau minuman atau sewa kereta seperti dahulu, jumlah ini beratus kali ganda wang yang diperlukan.

16. Tetapi untuk sogok pemimpin dan ahli Dewan Rakyat dengan berjuta tiap seorang, untuk sogok pegawai supaya menipu, besar kemungkinan wang sebanyak RM2.6 bilion diperlukan.

17. Jika Najib menang kerana sogok wang, dia akan perlu lebih banyak wang lagi untuk mengekalkan dirinya sebagai PM dan untuk PRU 15. Dari mana akan datang berbilion lagi jika tidak secara haram. Malaysia akan diperintah oleh seorang Perdana Menteri yang bergantung kepada rasuah. Najib sendiri berkata “Cash is King” “Wang Tunai adalah Raja”. Raja inilah yang disembah oleh Najib.

18. Najib akan nafi tetapi keadaan Negara sekarang amat buruk. Hubungan kaum tegang. Nilai Ringgit dan saham jatuh dengan teruknya jauh lebih teruk dari Thailand, Singapura dan lain-lain Negara. Kos sara hidup melambung naik kerana GST dan lain-lain. Hutang Negara bertimbun dan lain-lain.

19. Inilah masa depan Malaysia jika Najib kekal. Segala cara menukar Perdana Menteri yang mengikut undang-undang dan Perlembagaan Negara sudah ditutup oleh Najib. Hanya dengan suara keramat rakyat dibantu dengan undi tidak percaya Dewan Rakyat sahaja yang boleh menjatuhkan Najib dan menyelamatkan Negara daripada perasuah.

20. Oleh itu saya terpaksa menyertai demonstrasi jalanan anjuran Bersih yang bertema singkirkan Najib kerana rasuah, dan saya rayu kepada ahli Dewan Rakyat UMNO dan BN supaya menyokong undi tidak percaya kepada Najib. BN tidak akan jatuh setelah Najib disingkir. BN masih parti majoriti.

21. Selagi Najib berkuasa semala itulah ekonomi merosot, nilai Ringgit jatuh, saham jatuh, kos sara hidup meningkat kerana GST, hutang Negara bertimbun dan tidak dapat dibayar, pengangguran bertambah, berbilion duit rakyat disalahgunakan.

22. Inilah nasib yang menunggu Malaysia kerana Najib.

ENG VERSION
1. I attended the demonstration organized by the Bersih on 29 to 30 August. Many have wondered whether I have become a supporter of Bersih. Do I support the opposition party DAP and Kit Siang. There are also some that asked whether I now favour the Chinese.

2. I did say that street protests should not be used for political pressure as it affects business, especially small businesses and the national economy. Is it not now my action reflects the flip-flop nature of politics.

3. I do not agree with demonstrations as there are other avenues that can be used to pressure the Government when there is abuse of power.

4. We can make a police report, hoping the police and the public prosecutor will take action, bringing the accused to court.

5. But now Najib had dismantled and destroyed the institutions of government that are tasked with protecting the rights of citizens.

6. When the accused had made Government money disappeared through 1MDB, Najib handed over the investigation to the Auditor General and the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee. People were told to wait until the investigations by these agencies are completed.

7. When the sum of RM2.6 billion appeared in Najib’s personal account, and he cannot deny this money in his account, and many had asked where the money came from, and no reasonable explanation can be given by Najib, then a task force was formally formed to investigate this money.

8. The task force is comprised of the Public Prosecutor, Inspector-General of Police, Head of Anti-Corruption Agency and Central Bank Governor.

9. People wer waiting for the results of this investigation. Suddenly, the Public Prosecutor was dismissed by Najib, Head of Anti-Corruption Agency was ordered to go on vacation, and Central Bank Governor threatened because it seemed Bank Negara leaked information. Thus ceased the investigation by this body.

10. At the same time the Chairman of the PAC and the three other members were given positions in the Government and the investigation by PAC on 1MDB money was stopped.

11. Several police officers and other officials were moved to other positions so that they were no longer able to continue the investigation.

12. What is left and the newly appointed are people who do not show any interest in making investigations, even wilfully obstructing any investigation into 1MDB money and RM2.6 billion in Najib’s account.

13. All channels to investigate 1MDB and RM2.6 billion in Najib’s account are no longer available.

14. Instead Najib and his henchmen often times claimed the RM2.6 billion money is a donation. No necessity to identify the donor, the source of his wealth, in what form the money was given, the banks involved and other details. In fact, this claim does not make any sense.

15. To leaders of UMNO Najib claimed the RM2.6 billion is for the 14th General Elections. If this is for the party to buy ‘nasi lemak’ or drinks or rent cars as in the past, this is hundreds of times more than the amount of money required.

16. But in order to bribe leaders and members of the House of Representatives by millions for each person, to bribe officials in order to deceive, it is highly probable that a sum of RM2.6 billion is required.

17. If Najib wins by bribing, he will need more money to retain himself as the PM and for PRU 15. From where will come the billions if not illegally. Malaysia will be governed by a Prime Minister who relies on corruption. He himself said, “Cash is King”. This is the King that is worshipped by Najib.

18. Najib will deny, but the situation in the country is now very bad. Tense race relations. The value of Ringgit and shares fell very badly, much worse than Thailand, Singapore and other countries. The cost of living skyrocketed because of GST and others. National debt piled up and others.

19. This is the future of Malaysia if Najib remains. All avenues to change the Prime Minister according to the law and the National Constitution have been closed by Najib. Only the sacred voice of the people assisted by a vote of no confidence in the House of Representatives can bring down Najib and save the country from the corrupt.

20. Therefore, I had to join street demonstrations organized by Bersih themed ‘get rid of Najib because of corruption’, and I appeal to UMNO and BN members of Parliament to support the vote of no confidence on Najib. BN will not fall after Najib is dismissed. BN is still the majority party.

21. As long as Najib remains in authority that will be for how long there is going to be economic slump, fall in ringgit, fall in stocks, the rise in cost of living because of GST, national debt will piled up and cannot be paid, increased unemployment, billions of public fund misused.

22. This is the fate that awaits Malaysia because of Najib.

THE 2.6 BILLION DONATION?

1. Dato’ Sri Najib and his supporters should stop trying to convince Malaysians that the 2.6 billion Ringgit in his private account is a donation.

2. No one believes or can believe such a huge sum of money can be donated by anyone to Dato’ Sri Najib or to anyone for whatever reason.

3. Explaining that it was given because of Malaysia’s stand against the Islamic State is absurd as the Islamic State showed their brand of terrorism only in 2014 whereas the money came in in 2013 or before.

4. Saying that it is because of Malaysia’s moderation in Islam is equally absurd as Malaysia had never been extreme in its practice of Islam.

5. Why 700 million dollars? Surely it is too big for the needs of Malaysian elections, except if it is to bribe the Malaysian electorate. Why should anyone want to bribe the Malaysian electorate so Najib would win. Malaysians have supported the BN without the need to be paid huge bribes by anyone, least of all by foreigners.

6. The new DPM says he has seen the Arab who gave the money. Then let him give proof that this Arab has huge sums of money to give away to Malaysia and many other countries. Which countries. What is the source of this money. What business does he do? What is the name of the bank he uses. Show his account in the bank, the cheques he issued, particularly the 700 million USD. The recipient bank should be holding these cheques.

7. All these information could have been verified by the task force of four. But Najib dismantled the task force by sacking the A.G., sending the head of MACC on leave, and accusing Bank Negara of leaking Government secrets.

8. Now the MACC is said to be still investigating the 2.6 billion. It is an emasculated MACC. If Najib is serious about investigating his 2.6 billion Ringgit in Ambank, he should reconstitute the original tasks force. A new task force filled with his people has no credibility.

9. Banks have to maintain banking secrecy. But banks are also required to report suspected money laundering. Malaysian banks, Singapore banks, Swiss banks and American banks must not keep secret their business with money suspected of being stolen. What have they done?

10. When stolen money is put through banks, the objective is to make it legal, to launder it. Yet the money has disappeared from Ambank because because the account was closed.

11. When the account is closed, it cannot mean that the huge amount of money is taken out in cash. It must have been transferred to another bank. Yet we don’t hear of any bank anywhere reporting this money is with them. Two accounts are reported to be frozen in Singapore. Is that all. Surely the holder of the account should be investigated. But so far nothing is heard. Do the banks get to keep the money! If it is not reported to the authorities for action to be taken, then effectively the money has been laundered.

12. If this is so then why have banks to scrutinise large amounts of money deposited with it. They might as well not scrutinise if the suspiciously huge amount of money, the subject of much controversy is just retained by them.

13. The public has a right to know because the public does not believe that the 2.6 billion Ringgit was a gift personally to the PM of Malaysia for him to win elections. Malaysians would not like to believe their candidate for the highest office in the country is a nominee of some person from another country. What will be his obligation to his supporters. Will he serve Malaysians or some foreign country.

14. Stop thinking that Malaysians are stupid.


 

VERSI BM
DERMA 2.6 BILION

1. Dato’ Sri Najib dan penyokong-penyokongnya perlu berhenti untuk cuba meyakinkan rakyat Malaysia bahawa 2.6 bilion Ringgit dalam akaun peribadinya adalah derma.

2. Tiada siapa percaya atau boleh percaya bahawa wang sejumlah besar itu boleh diderma oleh sesiapa kepada Dato’ Sri Najib atau kepada sesiapa sahaja atas apa jua sebab.

3. Menjelaskan bahawa ia telah diberi kerana pendirian Malaysia terhadap Islamic State (IS) adalah tidak munasabah kerana Islamic State mulai menunjukkan jenama keganasan mereka itu hanya pada tahun 2014 manakala wang itu masuk pada tahun 2013 atau sebelum.

4. Berkata ia adalah kerana sikap kesederhanaan Malaysia dalam Islam adalah juga tidak masuk akal kerana Malaysia tidak pernah berpendirian melampau dalam amalan Islam.

5. Mengapa 700 juta dolar? Sesungguhnya ini adalah terlalu besar untuk keperluan pilihan raya di Malaysia, kecuali ia adalah untuk merasuah pengundi Malaysia. Mengapa ada orang yang mahu merasuahkan pengundi Malaysia supaya Najib boleh menang. Rakyat Malaysia telah menyokong BN tanpa perlu dibayar rasuah besar oleh sesiapa sahaja, lebih-lebih lagi oleh orang-orang asing.

6. TPM baru mengatakan dia telah berjumpa Arab yang memberikan wang itu. Jikalau begitu hendaklah ia buktikan bahawa Arab ini mempunyai sejumlah wang yang banyak untuk diberikan kepada Malaysia dan negara-negara lain. Apakah sumber wang ini? Apa perniagaan yang dia buat? Apakah nama bank yang dia gunakan? Tunjukkan akaunnya di bank, cek-cek yang beliau keluarkan, terutamanya USD700 juta itu. Bank penerima mesti masih memegang cek-cek itu.

7. Semua maklumat ini mungkin telah pun disahkan oleh pasukan petugas yang empat itu. Tetapi Najib telah membongkarkan pasukan petugas dengan memecat Peguam Negara, menghantar ketua SPRM bercuti, dan menuduh Bank Negara membocorkan rahsia Kerajaan.

8. Sekarang SPRM dikatakan masih menyiasat 2.6 bilion itu. Ia adalah suatu SPRM yang telah dilumpuhkan. Jika Najib serius untuk menyiasat RM2.6 bilion kepunyaannya dalam Ambank, beliau perlu melantik semula pasukan tugas yang asal. Satu pasukan petugas baru yang penuh dengan orang-orangnya tidak mempunyai kredibiliti.

9. Bank perlu mengekalkan kerahsiaan perbankan. Tetapi bank-bank juga dikehendaki melaporkan pengubahan wang haram yang disyaki. Bank-bank Malaysia, bank-bank Singapura, bank-bank Switzerland dan bank-bank Amerika tidak patut merahsiakan perniagaan mereka yang melibatkan wang yang disyaki dicuri. Apa yang telah dilakukan mereka?

10. Apabila wang yang dicuri dimasukkan melalui bank-bank, objektifnya adalah untuk menjadikan ia halal, untuk menyucinya (launder). Namun wang itu telah lesap dari Ambank kerana akaun itu ditutup.

11. Apabila akaun ditutup, ini tidak bermakna bahawa jumlah wang yang besar itu dibawa keluar secara tunai. Ia semestinya telah dipindahkan kepada bank lain. Namun kita tidak mendengar mana-mana bank yang melaporkan wang ini ada pada mereka. Dua akaun dilaporkan dibekukan di Singapura. Itu sahajakah? Sesungguhnya pemegang akaun perlu disiasat. Tetapi setakat ini tiada apa yang kedengaran. Adakah bank-bank boleh ambil wang ini! Jika ini tidak dilaporkan kepada pihak berkuasa untuk tindakan yang perlu diambil, sudah jelas wang ini telah dicuci (laundered).

12. Jika ini adalah demikiannya, maka mengapa bank perlu meneliti sejumlah wang yang banyak yang didepositkan dengannya. Lebih baik mereka langsung tidak meneliti jika jumlah besar yang mencurigakan itu, yang menjadikan subjek penuh kontroversi ini, disimpan sahaja oleh mereka.

13. Orang ramai mempunyai hak untuk tahu kerana orang ramai tidak percaya bahawa RM2.6 bilion adalah hadiah peribadi kepada PM Malaysia untuk beliau memenangi pilihan raya. Rakyat Malaysia tidak mahu mempercayai bahawa calon mereka untuk pejabat tertinggi di negara ini merupakan penama seseorang dari negara lain. Apakah yang akan menjadi kewajipan beliau kepada penyokong-penyokong? Adakah beliau akan berkhidmat untuk rakyat Malaysia atau untuk negara asing?

14. Berhentilah berfikir bahawa rakyat Malaysia bodoh.

UPSIDE DOWN LAW

1. There is a blatant attempt by Najib and his supporters to make the illegitimate legitimate and vice-versa.

2. Thus Najib’s stoppage of the investigations on 1MDB and his own possession of RM2.6 billion is made to appear legal and right while the investigators who were acting completely in accordance with the laws of the country are accused of acting outside their terms of reference and therefore not legitimate. To support their comment they invented terms of reference of the task force.

3. On the other hand he and his supporters are trying to make out that a vote of non-confidence against him by Parliament is not proper and constitute an abuse of the democratic system and an illegal attempt to overthrow the elected Government. But everyone knows that a vote of non- confidence is absolutely legal.

4. Najib seems to have forgotten that the BN overthrew the elected Government of Perak by claiming it had majority support in the state assembly. It should have done so through a vote of non-confidence. But BN was not sure that it would have majority support if the State Assembly sat. So it made out its case before the ruler despite there being no provision in the constitution or laws of the country for a ruler to dismiss an elected Government.

5. A vote of non-confidence is necessary now because Najib has made BN members of Parliament beholden to him by giving them lucrative posts in the Government. Even those who had come to me complaining about Najib’s administration before, upon being given posts in his government, have now changed their stand. One of them who claimed to have documentary evidence of Najib’s misconduct, now gladly support him upon being made minister.

6. Other BN members of Parliament have also been turned around after a short closed door talk and appeals to greed. Sharir now claims it is proper to receive money from the President. It is really improper. All donations in the past were made to the party’s fund operated by the trustees. Support for the President is only in so far as he implements party policies. It is not personal to him. He has openly said that since they received money from him they should support him. This is bribery. Is the President bribing UMNO leaders in order to gain their support? Apparently this is what he is doing. He has corrupted UMNO and those who accepted money from him support corruption in the party. Really Najib has made UMNO, the party that won independence for Malaysia, into a rotten and corrupt party. People are disgusted with UMNO now.

7. Now the possible BN supporters of a non-confidence vote are being named publicly to “gempaq” (intimidate) them. They are being accused of working with the opposition. This is a warning to other BN members not to support the non-confidence vote. It may be necessary once again to give BN MPs a holiday in Taiwan.

8. The opposition should really want Najib to continue leading the BN as this would ensure them victory in the coming election. But the prospect of having a PM who uses money to win support and who overturns the law upside down cannot be appealing to the opposition for much longer. So rumours of their non-confidence motion may be true.

9. But from reports and comments in the alternative media the opposition and most Malaysians are truly worried and angry over Najib’s abuses of power. He would not be beyond rigging elections to ensure winning the next elections.

10. But the Opposition just do not have the numbers. If the demands for Najib to step down by UMNO rank and file is assessed, there would be quite a number of the party’s MPs who would also like to see Najib removed. They do not believe the nonsensical explanations about the disappearance of 1MDB money or the RM2.6 billion in Najib’s private account. These MPs could vote with the opposition in a non-confidence

11. It is of course not something the BN MPs like to do. They would not like to becoming instrumental in bringing down a BN Government. If the opposition is really keen to be rid of Najib, they can only do so if only Najib goes but the BN Government stays, led by another leader.

12. The Opposition would have to find a formula which would see a BN without Najib still forming the Government if it wants BN MPs’ support. Under previous BN Governments, the opposition had always won seats in Parliament and had beaten the BN in many States. Najib’s lack of respect for the law and constitution and his willingness to buy politicians and civil servants may mean the end of Parliamentary Democracy in Malaysia. It can mean no opposition just as in UMNO opposition to him has been snuffed out.

BM VERSION
UNDANG-UNDANG TUNGGANG TERBALIK

1. Terdapat satu percubaan yang terang-terangan oleh Najib dan para penyokongnya untuk menghalalkan yang haram dan sebaliknya.

2. Jadi, tindakan Najib memberhentikan siasatan ke atas 1MDB dan pemilikannya wang sejumlah RM2.6 bilion dibuat kelihatan halal dan betul manakala para penyiasat yang bertindak sepenuhnya mengikut undang-undang negara dituduh bertindak di luar terma rujukan mereka dan oleh itu tidak sah. Bagi menyokong komen mereka, mereka mencipta terma rujukan pasukan petugas.

3. Sebaliknya beliau dan penyokongnya cuba untuk menjadikan undi tidak percaya terhadap beliau oleh Parlimen sebagai tidak wajar dan merupakan satu penyalahgunaan sistem demokrasi dan usaha haram untuk menggulingkan kerajaan yang dipilih rakyat. Tetapi semua orang tahu bahawa undi tidak percaya adalah benar-benar sah.

4. Najib seolah-olah sudah terlupa bahawa BN menggulingkan Kerajaan Perak yang dipilih dengan mendakwa ia mempunyai sokongan majoriti di Dewan Undangan Negeri. Ia sepatutnya berbuat demikian melalui undi tidak percaya. Tetapi BN tidak pasti bahawa ini akan mendapat sokongan majoriti jika Dewan Undangan Negeri bersidang. Oleh itu, ia membawa kes ke bawah duli Raja walaupun tiada peruntukan dalam perlembagaan atau undang-undang negara yang membolehkan Raja menolak kerajaan yang dipilih.

5. Undi tidak percaya adalah perlu sekarang kerana Najib telah membuat ahli-ahli Parlimen BN terhutang budi kepada beliau dengan memberikan mereka jawatan yang lumayan dalam Kerajaan. Malah mereka yang telah datang kepada saya untuk mengadu tentang pentadbiran Najib sebelum ini, apabila diberi jawatan dalam kerajaan beliau, kini telah berubah pendirian mereka. Salah seorang daripada mereka yang mendakwa mempunyai bukti dokumentari salah laku Najib, kini dengan senang hati menyokong beliau setelah dijadikan Menteri.

6. Anggota Parlimen BN yang lain juga telah berpusing selepas satu ceramah tertutup yang pendek dan rayuan untuk ketamakan. Sharir kini mendakwa adalah wajar untuk menerima wang dari Presiden. Ia adalah benar-benar tidak wajar. Semua sumbangan pada masa lalu telah disalurkan kepada dana parti yang dikendalikan oleh pemegang amanah. Sokongan untuk Presiden hanya sekadar yang dia melaksanakan dasar-dasar parti. Ini bukan peribadi baginya. Beliau telah secara terbuka berkata, oleh sebab mereka menerima wang daripadanya mereka perlu menyokong beliau. Ini adalah rasuah. Apakah Presiden memberi rasuah kepada pemimpin UMNO untuk mendapatkan sokongan mereka? Rupa-rupanya ini adalah apa yang dia lakukan. Beliau telah korupkan UMNO dan orang-orang yang menerima wang daripadanya menyokong rasuah dalam parti. Sebenar-benarnya Najib telah jadikan UMNO, parti yang memenangi kemerdekaan untuk Malaysia, sebuah parti teruk dan korup. Orang ramai meluat dengan UMNO sekarang.

7. Sekarang bakal penyokong undi tidak percaya BN telah dinamakan secara umum untuk “gempaq” (intimidate) mereka. Mereka dituduh bekerjasama dengan pembangkang. Ini adalah amaran kepada ahli-ahli BN yang lain supaya jangan menyokong usul undi tidak percaya. Mungkin perlu sekali lagi untuk memberi Ahli Parlimen BN percutian di Taiwan.

8. Pembangkang benar-benar mahu Najib terus memimpin BN kerana ini akan memastikan kemenangan bagi mereka dalam pilihan raya akan datang. Tetapi prospek adanya PM yang menggunakan wang untuk memenangi sokongan dan yang tunggang terbalikkan undang-undang tidak menarik kepada pembangkang untuk lebih lama lagi. Jadi khabar angin undi tidak percaya mereka mungkin benar.

9. Tetapi dari laporan dan komen dalam media alternatif pemangkang dan kebanyakan rakyat Malaysia benar-benar bimbang dan marah dengan penyalahgunaan kuasa Najib. Penipuan dalam pilihan raya akan bukan lagi suatu perkara asing baginya untuk memastikan kemenangan pilihan raya akan datang.

10. Tetapi pembangkang tidak mempunyai bilangan anggota yang cukup. Jika desakan untuk Najib berundur oleh akar umbi UMNO dinilai, akan terdapat agak ramai juga Ahli Parlimen parti itu yang ingin melihat Najib dibuang. Mereka tidak percaya penjelasan yang karut tentang kehilangan wang 1MDB atau RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun peribadi Najib. Ahli-ahli Parlimen ini boleh mengundi dengan pembangkang dalam undi tidak percaya.

11. Ini sudah tentu bukan satu perkara yang Ahli Parlimen BN suka lakukan. Mereka tidak mahu memainkan peranan dalam menjatuhkan Kerajaan BN. Jika pembangkang benar-benar berminat untuk memecat Najib, mereka akan hanya berbuat demikian jika Najib sahaja yang pergi tetapi Kerajaan BN kekal, yang diketuai oleh pemimpin lain.

12. Pembangkang perlu mencari formula yang akan menyaksikan BN masih membentuk Kerajaan tanpa Najib jika mahu sokongan Ahli Parlimen BN. Di bawah Kerajaan BN sebelum ini, pembangkang sentiasa memenangi kerusi di Parlimen dan mengalahkan BN dalam banyak Negeri. Kekurangan Najib menghormati undang-undang dan perlembagaan dan kesediaannya untuk membeli ahli-ahli politik dan penjawat awam boleh membawa makna akhirnya Demokrasi Berparlimen di Malaysia. Ini mungkin bermakna tiada pembangkang seperti dalam UMNO, pembangkang bagi beliau telah dilenyapkan.

MALAYSIA 2

1. What is happening in Malaysia today is unprecedented. The rule of law has been turned upside down and the people seem powerless to do anything to put it upright again.

2. This is because the very leader entrusted with upholding the law has become the subject of the due process of the law. It is alleged that he has broken the law. As no one is above the law, it follows that he must be investigated to determine if indeed he had broken the law.

3. Although this is unprecedented in Malaysia, this had happened in many other countries, including in the developed West.

4. Recall the case of President Nixon of the United States of America. He had used Government officials to spy on his political rival. This was considered as abuse of power in the U.S.

5. Eventually he was impeached and was forced to resign as President of the U.S. The Vice President took over and in due course elections were held. The Vice-President won. End of problem.

Continue reading MALAYSIA 2