1MDB EXITS POWER BUSINESS

1. It is reported that 1MDB would reduce between RM16 bil to RM18 bil of its debts after selling “Edra”.

2. I am trying to work out how the savings are achieved.

3. 1MDB bought the power plants together with debts of RM6 bil for RM 18 billion Ringgit. CGN pays RM 9.83 billion for 100% of the energy assets.

4. It should be noted that at the time 1MDB purchased the power plants, the Ringgit was at 3.2 per US Dollar. It is now at 4.2 Ringgit per US Dollar. In US dollar terms the 9.83 billion Ringgit paid by the Chinese Company is worth much less than the 9.83 billion Ringgit paid by 1MDB.

Continue reading 1MDB EXITS POWER BUSINESS

Menghadapi Cabaran

1.​ Dalam kehidupan manusia, menghadapi cabaran adalah perkara biasa. Sudah tentu jika sesiapa mencebur diri dalam bidang politik, lebih banyak cabaran akan dihadapi. Jika ingin terus dalam bidang politik semua cabaran ini mesti diterima. Mereka yang tidak sanggup menghadapi dan mengatasi cabaran adalah lebih baik tinggal sahaja bidang politik.

2.​Semasa saya jadi presiden UMNO dan Perdana Menteri cabaran tidak pernah berhenti. Sudah tentu ada percubaan menjatuhkan saya sebagai presiden UMNO.

3.​Diantara cabaran yang terbesar ialah apabila Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah dicalonkan untuk bertanding jawatan presiden UMNO.

4.​Kita sudah terima sistem demokrasi dalam pemilihan pemimpin. Apa yang dilakukan oleh Tengku Razaleigh adalah sah dalam sistem demokrasi. Tiada apa yang boleh dilakukan oleh saya untuk mengelak dari dicabar olehnya.

5.​Maka Tengku Razaleigh dan ramai penyokong-penyokongnya berkempenlah di seluruh bahagian dan cawangan UMNO di seluruh Malaysia. Mereka bebas bertemu dengan ahli, cawangan dan bahagian-bahagian UMNO.

6.​Kedudukan Tengku Razaleigh sebagai Menteri Perdagangan dalam kerajaan tidak terjejas. Demikian juga ramai menteri-menteri dan pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO yang memihak kepadanya.

7.​Pengundian semasa mesyuarat agong UMNO berjalan dengan baik. Kerana terjatuh pada hari Jumaat, pengundian dihentikan dan kempen dapat diteruskan dikalangan perwakilan oleh penyokong Tengku Razaleigh.

8.​Perkiraan undi dibuat berkali-kali kerana ada yang tidak puas hati dengan keputusan. Hanya pada jam lapan malam barulah keputusan dapat diisytihar.

9.​Saya menang dengan kelebihan hanya 43 undi. Saya terima. Peristiwa yang berlaku selepas itu diketahui umum dan tidak perlu saya ulangi disini.

10.​Pada bulan Disember 2015 ini, Mesyuarat Agong UMNO akan diadakan.

11.​Tidak akan ada apa-apa pertandingan. Tetapi entah kenapa usaha sedang dibuat oleh UMNO supaya perbahasan berkenaan perkara tertentu, khususnya 1MDB dan wang sebanyak 2.6 billion Ringgit dalam akaun peribadi Dato Sri Najib tidak boleh dibangkit.

12.​Persidangan pula akan tertutup kepada orang ramai. Tidak semua dari ucapan perwakilan akan disiar. Hanya ucapan presiden sahaja akan disiar.

13.​Sepatutnya Muhyiddin Yassin, sebagai Timbalan Presiden akan membuka persidangan sayap – Pemuda, Wanita dan Puteri. Amaran sudah diberi supaya ahli UMNO tidak akan bercakap berkenaan perkara ini.

14.​Apakah jenis Mesyuarat Agong UMNO ini?

15.​Saya tidak akan bertanding untuk apa-apa jawatan. Tetapi usaha gigih sedang dijalan untuk menutup mulut saya, untuk menyekat saya dari berjumpa dengan ahli UMNO, bahkan orang ramai. Dewan dimana mesyuarat boleh diadakan yang dihadiri oleh saya tidak boleh didapati kerana semua pemilik takut didera oleh Kerajaan.

16. Ada iklim ketakutan yang menghalang segala kegiatan yang bersangkutan dengan mengkritik Kerajaan. Ia seolah-olah menjadi jenayah yang tidak tertulis. Tetapi dakwaan dibuat kononnya ini Negara demokrasi. Sesiapa yang cuba sabotaj demokrasi Malaysia boleh dikena penjara hingga 15 tahun. Tetapi sebenarnya yang mensabotaj demokrasi Malaysia ialah Kerajaan sendiri.

17. Bermacam jenis tekanan digunakan yang tidak demokratik.

18. Ada yang berhadapan dengan pemeriksaan pendapatan kononnya kerana tidak bayar cukai. Ada yang disoal siasat oleh polis. Ada yang dimasuk dalam tahanan tanpa berasas kepada undang-undang. Ada yang diugut akan kehilangan kontrak dll.

19.​Kata pepatah berani kerana benar; takut kerana salah. Apakah kerana salah yang takut sangat 1MDB dan 2.6 billion ringgit dibincang.

 

ENG VERSION
Facing Challenges

1. In human life, challenges are common. Of course if anyone engages in politics, there are more challenges to be faced. If you want to continue in politics these challenges must be accepted. Those who were not able to face and overcome these challenges it is better to leave the political field.

2. When I became president of UMNO and the Prime Minister challenges never stopped. Of course there were attempts to unseat me as UMNO president.

3. Among the biggest challenges was when Tengku Razaleigh was nominated to run for the presidency of UMNO.

4. We have accepted the democratic system in the selection of leaders. What Tengku Razaleigh did was legitimate in a democratic system. There was nothing I could do to avoid being challenged by him.

5. So Tengku Razaleigh and many of his supporters campaigned at party divisions and branches throughout Malaysia. They were free to meet with members, branches and divisions of UMNO.

6. Tengku Razaleigh’s position as Industry Minister in the government were not affected. Likewise, many ministers and UMNO leaders who sided with him.

7. Voting during UMNO general meeting went well. As it fell on Friday, voting was stopped and supporters of Tengku Razaleigh was able to continue campaigning among the delegates.

8. Counting of votes was made many times because there were some that were not happy with the results. It was only at eight o’clock at night that a decision can be declared.

9. I won by only 43 votes. I accepted. Events that occurred after that are well known and do not need me to repeat here.

10. This December 2015, the UMNO General Meeting will be held.

11. There would not be any election whatsoever. But somehow for whatever reason, efforts are being made by UMNO that debate on certain subject matters, especially 1MDB and the sum of 2.6 billion ringgit in the personal account of Dato Sri Najib, must not be raised.

12. The conference will be closed to the public. Not all speeches by delegates will be broadcasted. Only the president’s speech will be broadcasted.

13. By right Muhyiddin Yassin, as Deputy President will open the conference of the wings – youth, women and women’s youth. Warnings have been given so that UMNO members will not speak on this matter.

14. What kind of UMNO General Meeting is this?

15. I will not be running for any office. But big efforts are being made to silence me, to stop me from meeting with members of UMNO, even with the public. Conference rooms where meetings could be held which can be attended by me are not available as all owners fear reprimand by the Government.

16. There is a climate of fear which prevents all activities concerned with criticizing the Government. It seems to have become a non-written crime. But these allegations are made in this supposedly democratic country. Anyone who tries to sabotage democratic Malaysia is liable to be imprisoned up to 15 years. But in actual fact the government itself is sabotaging democratic Malaysia.

17. Various undemocratic pressures are being deployed.

18. There are people faced with inspection of their income, supposedly for not paying income taxes. There are people being questioned by police. Some are detained not based on any law. Some are threatened with loss of contracts etc.

19. As the saying goes, courage because of truth, fear because of wrongdoings. Is it because of wrongdoings that there is so much fear for 1MDB and 2.6 billion ringgit being discussed.

THE POLICE INTERVIEW

1. There were a large number of reporters waiting to interview me about the questioning by the police that the IGP and the Minister of Home Affairs had promised.

2. I was not sure how to handle the reporters. I know the police is a professional institution. It works for the elected Government. Still I was not quite sure why the police i.e. the Government wanted to question me. Had I committed a crime or is it that they wanted some information from me for the prosecution of others.

3. I had been interviewed by the police and the AG’s chambers before. They wanted to make me a Government witness. I listened to them and concluded that there was no case for the accused person to answer. So I refused to be a prosecution witness.

4. This time it is not about making me a witness. They wanted answers to questions. My lawyers advised me not to answer most of those questions. So I did not.

Continue reading THE POLICE INTERVIEW

EVERYTHING IS FINE

1. Wednesday’s (November 4, 2015) paper reports that we are not facing a financial crisis and we are not going to go into financial crisis.

2. Eight prominent people including the PM tell us everything is fine.

3. Now if everything is fine why is there a need to arrest people for sabotaging the banking and financial system of the country? If they sabotage surely the banking and finance of Malaysia would not be fine. They would be dysfunctional.

4. But is it true that everything is hunky-dory; everything is fine. It can’t be! The banks and the financial system may be fine, but there are other indicators to show that the economy is not fine. Continue reading EVERYTHING IS FINE

SABOTAGE

1.​ I am confused by the AG’s statement that Dato Seri Khairuddin and Matthias Chang are being charged with sabotage of the nation’s banking and financial system.

2.​ I assume that their reports to the police authorities in the UK, Switzerland and Hong Kong, where the transactions took place, are the basis of these sabotage charges which if convicted may land them in jail for up to 15 years.

3.​ But the publication by the foreign press of the shenanigans in the investments by 1MDB came out long before Khairuddin reported. These news reports were not casual reports but were very detailed descriptions of what and who were involved. They were reporting on what is well known to the whole world.

4.​ Why were these newspaper reports not satisfactorily rebutted by 1MDB or the MOF since the impression created about Malaysia’s alleged abuses of the financial and banking systems could result ultimately in the loss of confidence in Malaysia’s political and economic health and its financials?

5.​ But had there been no 1MDB and no 42 billion Ringgit being borrowed, the press would not report nor would there be any police reports. Wouldn’t these press reports then be considered as sabotage?

6.​ 1MDB may sell the 60 Ringgit p.s.f. land that it bought from the Government at 5000% above the purchase price and repay the loans. But the fact remains that had 1MDB not been created, the huge sum of borrowed money would not have disappeared. For this 1MDB and those responsible must still be charged for abuses of the banking and financial system, repayment of the loans notwithstanding. The creators of 1MDB and the managers are the people who sabotaged this country, which before this had a good record for financial management and a sound banking system. They are the people who should be charged in court for sabotage of the Malaysian banking and financial systems. Since it was Najib who created 1MDB, borrow 42 billion Ringgit and invested the money and losing it, Najib should also be charged with sabotage.

7.​ Alternatively everyone, from the initial set-up of 1MDB to the borrowing, to the newspaper reporters and the reports to the police should all be charged with sabotage of Malaysia’s financial and banking systems.

VERSI BM

SABOTAJ

1. Saya keliru dengan kenyataan Peguam Negara bahawa Dato Seri Khairuddin dan Matthias Chang sedang didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem perbankan dan kewangan negara.

2. Saya menganggap bahawa laporan mereka kepada pihak berkuasa polis di UK, Switzerland dan Hong Kong, di mana urus niaga itu berlaku, adalah asas kepada caj-caj sabotaj yang jika disabitkan kesalahan boleh dikenakan hukuman penjara sehingga 15 tahun.

3. Tetapi penerbitan oleh akhbar asing mengenai tipu helah dalam pelaburan oleh 1MDB keluar lebih lama sebelum Khairuddin melaporkannya. Laporan-laporan berita ini bukan laporan sambil lewa tetapi penerangan yang sangat terperinci mengenai apa dan siapa yang terlibat. Mereka melaporkan apa yang sudah diketahui umum di seluruh dunia.

4. Kenapa laporan-laporan akhbar ini tidak disangkal dengan memuaskan oleh 1MDB atau MOF sedangkan tanggapan yang telah terujud mengenai pendakwaan penyalahgunaan sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia boleh akhirnya mengakibatkan kehilangan keyakinan terhadap kesihatan politik dan ekonomi Malaysia dan kewangannya?

5. Jika sekiranya tidak wujud 1MDB dan tiada RM42 bilion yang dipinjam, akhbar tidak akan melaporkan dan tidak akan ada laporan-laporan polis. Tidakkah laporan-laporan akhbar itu dianggap sebagai sabotaj?

6. 1MDB boleh menjual tanah yang dibeli dengan harga RM60 kaki persegi daripada Kerajaan pada kadar 5000% atas harga pembelian dan membayar balik pinjaman. Tetapi pada hakikat seandainya 1MDB tidak dicipta, jumlah besar wang yang dipinjam itu tidak akan lesap. Untuk ini 1MDB dan mereka yang bertanggungjawab masih perlu didakwa kerana penyalahgunaan sistem perbankan dan kewangan, tidak terkecuali juga pembayaran balik pinjaman. Pencipta 1MDB dan pengurus-pengurusnya adalah mereka yang mensabotaj negara ini, yang sebelum ini mempunyai rekod yang baik bagi pengurusan kewangan dan sistem perbankan yang kukuh. Mereka adalah orang-orang yang patut didakwa di mahkamah kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia. Oleh sebab Najiblah yang mencipta 1MDB, meminjam RM42 bilion, melabur wang itu dan menghilangkannya, Najib juga sepatutnya didakwa kerana sabotaj.

7. Atau sebagai alternatif semua orang, dari awal penubuhan 1MDB hingga pinjamannya, pemberita-pemberita akhbar dan laporan kepada polis, semuanya harus didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia.

SEPARATION OF POWERS

1. The Deputy Prime Minister made reference to the separation of power when commenting on the statement of the Rulers over the need for investigations on 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account to be expedited. Is this a breach of the assumed separation of powers between the Rulers and the Government?

2. It is true that the Agong and the Malay Rulers are constitutional monarchs. But that does not mean that they are just rubber stamps to validate all the acts of their governments.

3. Sec 39 of the Federal Constitution (State constitutions follow closely that of the Federal constitution) states clearly that “The executive authority of the Federation shall be vested in the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and exercisable, subject to the provision of any Federal law and of the Second Schedule, by him or any Minister authorised by the Cabinet, but the Parliament may by law confer executive functions on other persons.

4. Section 40 states clearly that the Agong shall be entitled, at his request to any information available to the Cabinet.

5. These two sections clearly gives the Yang di-Pertuan Agong some executive roles.

6. Section 40 para (2) clearly states the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may act in his discretion in the performance of;

a) the appointment of the Prime Minister

b) the withholding of consent to a request for dissolution of Parliament

c) Federal law may make provisions for requiring the Agong to act after consultation with or on the recommendation of any person or body of persons

7. In the recent past we have seen Rulers rejecting nominees by the majority party for the office of Menteri Besar.

8. Should the Prime Minister request for the dissolution of Parliament, the Agong may reject.

9. Again we see here that the Agong and the Rulers may act on their own discretion. They may also consult and accept recommendations of any person or body of persons.

10. Obviously if petitions are made or there is a public clamour, the rulers may not have to listen only to the Cabinet.

11. Section 41 unequivocally states that the Yang di- Pertuan Agong shall be the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Federation. Clearly it is not just the privilege of wearing the uniform.

12. What is clear is that nothing in the Constitution talks about the separation of power between the Government and the Agong. In fact in many instances the Agong may act at his own discretion.

13. And the Agong may listen to other people than the Cabinet. This is only as it should be as failure of the Cabinet to address complaints by the people may require the Agong and the Rulers to urge the Government to respond.

14. In making their statement the Rulers were not in any way exceeding the provisions of the constitution. They were in fact abiding by the provisions of the constitution.

15. On the other hand the same cannot be said regarding the principle of the separation of powers between the legislative, the executive and the judiciary.

16. Currently the Prime Minister as head of the elected legislators is clearly not respecting these principles.

17. For example officers of the administration who were investigating 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit account have been transferred out to the Prime Minister’s Office, resulting in their stopping their work. Their replacements apparently was with approvals of the Prime Minister.

18. Officers of the MACC have been similarly treated, again resulting in the investigations being obstructed.

19. The Attorney-General, a member of the judicial establishment have been removed while he was carrying out the task of preparing the said case for the courts. In his place a judge was transferred to take over as AG. This is actually usurping the powers of the judiciary.

20. The AG was said to be sick, but he denied he was sick. As far as is known no medical certificate certifying that he was sick seem to have been issued.

21. All these are public knowledge. The Rulers may have heard and probably received petitions on the authoritarian disregard for the law and rules of Government.

22. The citizens of this country are the subjects of the Rulers. As Rulers they must care for the welfare of the people.

23. If in their opinion the Government should allow expeditious investigations to be carried over the issues of concern to the people and the country it is the duty of the Ruler to make known to the Government the dissatisfaction of the people over the issue and to ask for the matter to be attended to.

VERSI BM
PENGASINGAN KUASA

1. Timbalan Perdana Menteri merujuk kepada pengasingan kuasa apabila mengulas kenyataan Raja-Raja mengenai keperluan mempercepatkan penyiasatan ke atas 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib. Adakah ini satu pelanggaran pengasingan kuasa yang diandaikan antara Raja-Raja dan Kerajaan?

2. Ianya benar bahawa Agong dan Raja-Raja Melayu adalah raja berperlembagaan. Tetapi itu tidak bermakna bahawa mereka adalah pak turut semata-mata untuk mengesahkan semua tindakan Kerajaan.

3. Perkara 39 Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Perlembagaan Negeri mengikuti Perlembagaan Persekutuan) menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa “Kuasa Eksekutif Persekutuan hendaklah terletak kepada Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan, tertakluk kepada peruntukan mana-mana Undang-Undang Persekutuan dan peruntukan Jadual Kedua, dijalankan olehnya atau mana-mana Menteri yang diberi kuasa oleh Jemaah Menteri, tetapi Parlimen boleh, melalui undang-undang, memberikan fungsi eksekutif kepada individu lain.”

4. Perkara 40 menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa Agong adalah berhak, atas permintaannya, mendapat segala maklumat yang ada kepada Kabinet.

5. Kedua-dua bahagian ini jelas memberikan Yang di-Pertuan Agong beberapa peranan eksekutif.

6. Perkara 40 Peranggan (2) jelas menyatakan Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak menurut budi bicaranya dalam melaksanakan fungsi:

a) melantik seorang Perdana Menteri

b) tidak memperkenankan permintaan bagi pembubaran Parlimen

c) Undang-Undang Persekutuan boleh membuat peruntukan bagi mengkehendaki Agong bertindak selepas berunding dengan atau atas cadangan mana-mana individu atau sekumpulan individu.

7. Pada kebelakangan ini, kita melihat Raja-Raja telah menolak pencalonan oleh parti majoriti bagi jawatan Menteri Besar.

8. Sekiranya Perdana Menteri meminta untuk membubarkan Parlimen, Agong boleh menolak.

9. Sekali lagi kita lihat di sini bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja-Raja boleh bertindak atas budi bicara mereka sendiri. Mereka juga boleh berunding dan menerima cadangan daripada mana-mana individu atau kumpulan individu.

10. Jelas sekali jika petisyen telah dibuat atau ada suara desakan ramai, Raja-Raja tidak perlu hanya mendengar Kabinet.

11. Seksyen 41 tanpa ragu-ragu menyatakan bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong hendaklah menjadi Pemerintah Tertinggi Angkatan Tentera Persekutuan. Jelas sekali ini bukan sahaja hak istimewa untuk pemakaian seragam tersebut.

12. Apa yang jelas ialah tiada apa jua dalam Perlembagaan yang bercakap mengenai pengasingan kuasa di antara Kerajaan dan Agong. Malah dalam kebanyakkan keadaan, Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak mengikut budi bicara sendiri.

13. Dan Agong boleh mendengar individu selain daripada Kabinet. Inilah sebenar hakikat yang diharapkan kerana kegagalan Kabinet untuk menangani aduan rakyat memerlukan Agong dan Raja-Raja menggesa Kerajaan untuk bertindak balas.

14. Dalam membuat kenyataan mereka, Raja-Raja tidak berada dalam keadaan melebihi had peruntukan Perlembagaan. Mereka sebenarnya mematuhi peruntukan perlembagaan.

15. Sebaliknya, yang sama tidak boleh dikatakan mengenai prinsip pengasingan kuasa antara perundangan, eksekutif dan kehakiman.

16. Pada masa ini, Perdana Menteri, sebagai ketua penggubal undang-undang yang dipilih, secara jelas tidak menghormati prinsip-prinsip ini.

17. Sebagai contoh pegawai-pegawai pentadbiran yang sedang menyiasat 1MDB dan akaun RM2.6 bilion telah dipindahkan ke Jabatan Perdana Menteri, menyebabkan pemberhentian kerja mereka. Penggantian mereka adalah ketara dengan kelulusan Perdana Menteri.

18. Pegawai-pegawai SPRM telah diberi layanan yang sama, sekali lagi menyebabkan siasatan terhalang.

19. Peguam Negara, seorang ahli badan kehakiman telah disingkirkan ketika beliau menjalankan tugas menyediakan kes tersebut untuk mahkamah. Di tempat beliau seorang hakim telah dipindahkan untuk mengambil alih tugas sebagai Peguam Negara. Ini sebenarnya perampasan kuasa badan kehakiman.

20. Peguam Negara dikatakan sakit, tetapi dia menafikan dirinya sakit. Setakat yang diketahui, tiada sijil perubatan yang mengesahkan bahawa dia sakit telah dikeluarkan.

21. Semua ini adalah pengetahuan umum. Raja-Raja mungkin pernah mendengar dan mungkin juga menerima petisyen mengenai sikap pengabaian secara authoritarian undang-undang dan peraturan Kerajaan.

22. Rakyat negara ini adalah subjek Raja-Raja. Sebagai Raja-Raja mereka perlu menjaga kebajikan rakyat.

23. Jika pada pendapat mereka, Kerajaan perlu membenarkan siasatan cepat dan cekap dijalankan ke atas isu-isu yang penting kepada rakyat dan negara ini, adalah kewajipan Raja untuk memaklumkan kepada Kerajaan rasa tidak puas hati rakyat dengan isu ini dan meminta perkara ini diberi perhatian.

1 MDB CLEARED

1. The Attorney Generals Chambers have cleared 1MDB of any wrongdoings with regard to the use of the funds approved by Bank Negara for foreign investments.

2. But Bank Negara is obviously not satisfied and appealed to the AG without any change in the report. Again the AG rejected the appeal.

3. We know of course that the AG is empowered to decide whether a case should go to court or not. The presumption is that the AG would appreciate and understand the seriousness or otherwise of the case before him, that he would appreciate the concern of the complainant or agency making the report, that if there is dissatisfaction the case should be judged in a court of law by a judge and if still dissatisfied that an appeal be allowed.

4. That should be the way. But it would seem that the AG has made the judgement, rejecting the case as having no merit for a hearing in a court of law. And when an appeal is made, the appeal is dismissed by him on grounds which are not clear. There is a lack of transparency here.

5. Is this the rule of law that this country is supposed to uphold? Is the AG higher than a judge, that his judgement is final and there can be no appeal?

Continue reading 1 MDB CLEARED

TAWAU

1. Saya berada di Tawau pada 5 Oktober di atas jemputan dari seorang bekas calon parti lawan.

2. Ramai ahli UMNO di Sabah tidak dapat hadir bicara negarawan yang diadakan kerana dianjur oleh bukan UMNO. Kata mereka SUA UMNO amat marah jika ada ahli atau pemimpin yang hadir diperhimpunan ini.

3. Sesungguhnya saya sudah 15 tahun tidak ke Tawau. Sebab itu walaupun jemputan datang dari musuh UMNO saya terima kerana saya ingin lihat perubahan di Tawau. Kalau nak tunggu UMNO jemput, sampai bila pun saya tidak dapat lihat Tawau. Saya ini, walaupun masih ahli UMNO dan biasa menjadi Presiden UMNO, dianggap oleh kepimpinan UMNO sekarang sebagai musuh parti yang saya pimpin selama 22 tahun.

4. Ya lah. Saya tidak bersetuju dengan Dato Seri Najib, Presiden UMNO dan saya desak supaya dia disingkir. Tetapi dahulu saya juga cuba dijatuhkan oleh Tengku Razaleigh dan Musa Hitam. Tujuan mereka apabila mereka bertanding melawan saya dan Ghaffar ialah supaya saya tidak jadi Presiden lagi dan tidak jadi Perdana Menteri. Mereka berhajat menjatuhkan saya.

Continue reading TAWAU

NO CONFIDENCE VOTE

1. I read a report that the Speaker of Dewan Rakyat will not allow a motion of non-confidence to be tabled in the Dewan by anyone.

2. He insists that only he can decide whether such a motion can be put before the house or not.

3. The reason he says is that Parliamentary standing orders are silent on this matter. Also it had never been done before.

4. True, it had never been done before. That was because none of the previous five Prime Ministers had 2.6 billion Ringgit in their personal accounts, nor have they been involved in financial scandals and the alleged murder of anyone.

5. None of the previous Prime Ministers had dismantled the institutions investigating into the origins and whereabout of the money they had.

6. None of the previous Prime Ministers had borrowed RM42 billion at high cost to set up a development fund which became involved in shady deals.

7. None of them had invested more than one billion USD in dubious joint-venture projects with equally dubious Arab companies.

8. None of them had dissolved the joint-venture company only 6 months after formation and converted the 1MDB capital into loan with the partner they don’t think they should continue to have the joint-venture with.

9. But Najib is involved in all these. And now, other than saying the 1MDB assets are worth more than the 42 billion Ringgit borrowed, he cannot prove where the money is. The assets are actually Government land which Najib allowed 1MDB to acquire at ridiculously low prices, and then revalued 500 times more.

10. A vote of non-confidence is totally democratic. Parliament may not have any provision for it but the Constitution, the supreme law of the country clearly states that if the Prime Minister no longer commands the support of the majority of the members of Parliaments, he should resign. Article 43 (4) of the Federal Constitution states “If the Prime Minister ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House of Representatives, then, unless at his request the Yang di-Pertuan Agong dissolves Parliament, the Prime Minister shall tender the resignation of the Cabinet”.

11. So, is the Speaker trying to ignore the constitution?

12. Today, if you go abroad, foreigners, especially their press will ask, “Hey, what is happening to your country?” You will feel ashamed, but you can do nothing about it. The people who can do something are totally without shame. They openly admit to having received money by the millions from the Prime Minister. This is corruption at its worst. They support the PM because he gave them money, money which he cannot explain with any credibility that he obtained legally.

13. No wonder Malaysia is now listed as among the top of the corrupt countries of the world. And now the supporters of the Government do not even respect the Constitution.

14. No vote of non-confidence because the speaker will not allow it.

VERSI BM
Undi Tidak Percaya

1. Saya membaca laporan bahawa Yang di-Pertua Dewan Rakyat tidak akan membenarkan usul undi tidak percaya dibentangkan di Dewan oleh sesiapa pun.

2. Beliau menegaskan bahawa hanya dia boleh membuat keputusan sama ada usul boleh dibentangkan di dalam Dewan itu atau tidak.

3. Beliau berkata sebabnya ialah kerana perintah tetap (standing order) Parlimen bisu mengenai perkara ini. Juga ia tidak pernah dilakukan sebelum ini.

4. Benar, ia tidak pernah dilakukan sebelum ini. Ini adalah kerana tiada seorang pun daripada lima Perdana Menteri sebelum ini mempunyai 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun peribadi mereka, dan tiada pula mereka terlibat dalam skandal kewangan dan tuduhan pembunuhan sesiapa.

5. Tidak ada seorang daripada Perdana Menteri sebelum ini telah membongkarkan institusi-institusi penyiasat asal-usul dan di mana adanya wang yang mereka miliki.

6. Tidak ada seorang daripada Perdana Menteri sebelum ini meminjam RM42 bilion pada kos yang tinggi untuk menubuhkan dana pembangunan yang terlibat dalam urus niaga yang curigakan.

7. Tiada seorang pun daripada mereka telah melabur lebih satu bilion USD dalam projek usaha sama dengan syarikat-syarikat Arab yang kredibilitinya juga meragukan.

8. Tiada seorang pun daripada mereka telah membubarkan syarikat usaha sama hanya 6 bulan selepas pembentukan dan menukar modal 1MDB menjadi pinjaman dengan pasangan usaha sama itu yang mereka fikir tidak perlu lagi teruskan usaha sama itu.

9. Tetapi Najib terlibat dalam semua ini. Dan kini, selain daripada berkata aset 1MDB bernilai lebih daripada 42 bilion Ringgit yang dipinjam, dia tidak dapat membuktikan di mana wang itu berada. Aset ini adalah sebenarnya tanah Kerajaan yang Najib membenarkan 1MDB mengambil alih pada harga yang amat murah, dan kemudian dinilai semula lebih 500 kali ganda.

10. Suatu undi tidak percaya benar-benar demokratik. Parlimen mungkin tidak mempunyai apa-apa peruntukan untuk itu tetapi Perlembagaan, undang-undang tertinggi di negara ini dengan jelas menyatakan bahawa jika Perdana Menteri tidak lagi mendapat sokongan daripada majoriti ahli-ahli Parlimen, beliau harus meletakkan jawatan. Perkara 43 (4) Perlembagaan Persekutuan menyatakan “Jika Perdana Menteri tidak lagi mendapat kepercayaan majoriti ahli-ahli Dewan Rakyat, maka, melainkan jika atas permintaannya Yang di-Pertuan Agong membubarkan Parlimen, Perdana Menteri hendaklah menawar perletakan jawatan keseluruhan Kabinet “.

11. Jadi, adakah Yang di-Pertua Dewan cuba mengabaikan perlembagaan?

12. Hari ini, jika anda pergi ke luar negara, warga asing, terutama akhbar mereka akan bertanya, “Hai, apa yang berlaku kepada negara anda?” Anda akan berasa malu, tetapi anda tidak boleh berbuat apa-apa mengenainya. Mereka yang boleh melakukan sesuatu langsung tidak berasa malu. Mereka secara terbuka mengaku telah menerima jutaan wang daripada Perdana Menteri. Ini adalah rasuah pada peringkat paling teruk. Mereka menyokong PM kerana dia memberikan mereka wang, wang yang beliau sendiri tidak dapat menjelaskan dengan sebarang kredibiliti yang ianya diperolehi secara sah.

13. Tidak hairanlah Malaysia kini disenaraikan sebagai antara negara-negara korup di dunia. Dan kini penyokong kerajaan tidak langsung menghormati Perlembagaan.

14. Tiada undi tidak percaya kerana Yang di-Pertuan Dewan tidak akan membenarkannya.

NAJIB

1. I had worked hard to make Najib the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

2. But now I want him to be removed, to step down from being Prime Minister.

3. It is nothing personal.

4. It is because he has failed terribly as Prime Minister.

5. Very early I noted the wrong things he was doing.

6. We have been independent since 1957. We should be able to run our own country by ourself. Indeed we had been doing so for decades before Najib, and we did very well.

7. But Najib appointed several British officers as his advisers.

8. Najib appointed many foreign consultants to advise him on running the country.

9. These people cost billions of Ringgits but their advise were generally not good for the country. They knew nothing about the politics, economics and sensitivities of Malaysia. As a result the development of Malaysia has slowed down and the races are at each others throats.

10. Najib’s Government became extremely unpopular. Despite giving lots of money to the people, they rejected him in the elections of 2013. He performed worse than Abdullah, who was also rejected by the people. The Chinese rejected him totally despite his declaring himself to be their brother.

11. He antagonised the civil servants by setting up Pemandu to take over the job of the EPU. Pemandu non-Government personnel were paid very high salaries, far above the Government Salary Scheme. So annoyed were the Civil servants that a few, upon retirement joined the opposition party and stood as opposition candidates, something which never happened before.

12. The growth of the economy fell below those of the Philippines and Indonesia.

13. The currency depreciated and share prices went down badly creating problems for businesses, importers and exporters. The cost of living went up especially after the GST.

14. Then came the 1MDB scandal. A totally unnecessary fund was created which was to be financed by huge borrowings. The Government gave one million Ringgit as capital but 1MDB (1 Malaysia Development Berhad) borrowed 42 billion Ringgit from the market. It paid high interest of 5.9% and gave 10% commission to Goldman Sachs. Government never borrowed so much or paid such high rates.

15. 1MDB bought electric power plants at higher than market price. It also bought the debts of the power companies. Total cost was 18 billion Ringgit. 1 MDB lost so much money that it cannot pay the interest on the loans.

16. 1MDB bought Government land at 60 Ringgit per square foot when the real price is over RM3000 psf. Revaluing the land by 50 times, it claims its asset is bigger than its debts. This is like selling Approved Permits obtained free from the Government.

17. Then 1MDB entered into shady business with Petro Saudi as JV partner. It paid USD 1 Billion for its 40% share. Six months, later the JV was dissolved. But the USD 1 Billion together with another 700 million USD were converted to a loan to Petro Saudi. The money has now disappeared.

18. The only assets that 1MDB has are the power plants and the land in Kuala Lumpur. More than RM20 Billion of the 42 billion Ringgit cannot be traced or accounted for.

19. Then suddenly the Wall Street Journal reported that Najib had in his private account at the Arab Malaysian Bank USD700 million (amounting to RM2.6 billion at that time)

20. No PM of Malaysia or UMNO President can have that much money. All donations to UMNO are normally received and banked by the UMNO Treasurer. All assets are placed under the name of three trustees.

21. Never in the history of UMNO had there been more than RM250 million in cash. All other assets are in the form of shares, land and buildings. The President is duty-bound to hand over all donations to the treasurer for banking. The President never had UMNO money or money donated to UMNO for elections for example in his private account. There is no provision for UMNO accounts to be operated by the President.

22. Najib and his wife are well-known for a lavish life-style. Obviously millions were spent on the betrothal and numerous wedding ceremonies in Malaysia and Kazakhstan. Najib’s step-son spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying property in London, New York and California. He also financed the production of a Hollywood movie, “The Wolf of Wall Street” with over 100 million US Dollars.

23. On Najib’s salary as Prime Minister, it is impossible for him to spend millions on all these. A statement by the PMO claimed that the money for the foreign properties and film was inherited. It is impossible for Tun Razak, or Haji Noah or Rosmah’s father to have and leave hundreds of millions of Ringgit. They were not even known as millionaires. Najib’s brothers refuted the claim.

24. So where did the money come from. Najib claims the 2.6 billion Ringgit was donated to him by an Arab. This is ridiculous. Nobody ever gives that amount of money to anyone. And Najib cannot prove that the Arab had given the money.

25. And so a special task force consisting of the A.G, the Anti Corruption
Commissioner, the Governor of Bank Negara and the Inspector-General of Police was set up to investigate the source of the RM 2.6 billion in Najib’s private account at The Arab Malaysian Bank.

26. The Public Accounts Committee of the Dewan Rakyat was also investigating what happened to the RM 42 billion Ringgit borrowed by 1MDB. So was the Auditor General.

27. Suddenly Najib sacked the Attorney-General claiming he was sick. The A.G denied he was sick. There was no certificate by doctors to prove he was sick. Najib had no right to claim that the A.G was sick.

28. At the same time the head of the Anti-Corruption Commission was said to have gone on leave. The Governor of Bank Negara was silent. Later she stated she was afraid of being arrested.

29. Two of the Government members of the PAC were made deputy ministers and another two given other jobs. They could not carry on their work as PAC members. The PAC was without a Chairman and its investigation of 1MDB has stopped.

30. Two members of the Anti-Corruption Commission were arrested, released and transferred to the PM’s office. After complaints were made they were transferred back to the Commission.

31. The assistant head of the Special Branch was transferred out. He then made a strong statement against his transfer.

32. People who spoke about 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account, or reported on it were arrested, have their passports confiscated and threatened by the police with questioning. It seems that any question about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion constitute acts to undermine democracy and to topple a properly elected Government. People can be detained for up to 28 days without trial under a new law which is meant for acts of terrorism. Talking about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion seems to constitute acts of terrorism. Najib forgets that he was involved in the removal of his predecessor who was also elected democratically.

33. Then came a bombshell. Al Jazeera screened the story of the murder of the Mongolian girl Altantuya. It was clear from the story that Najib has something to do with the murder.

34. Many Malaysians refuse to believe it. But people all over the world believe the story. It has become an international scandal. It has brought shame to Malaysia. Everywhere one goes, one is asked, “What has happened to Malaysia”.

35. Between 1MDB, the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s private account and the murder of Altantuya, Malaysia’s good name has been totally blackened. Never before has Malaysia become so disgraced by its own Prime Minister. Never before have people looked down upon this country. Never before have Malaysians been so ashamed of their country.

36. Najib has paid people to demonstrate in the streets in support of him. He has of course made it illegal for people to demonstrate for his removal.

37. If the currency and the economy is to recover, Najib must cease to be Prime Minister of Malaysia. Malaysians must demand for Najib’s removal. It is totally democratic to demand for his removal. The actions he has taken to detain people for holding rallies to demand for his removal is what is undemocratic and against the laws of this country.

38. I call upon all Malaysians to demand that Najib allows the investigation against him to be carried out by independent people not appointed by him. Najib must allow due legal process to go on. If it is found that he had done illegal things he should be made to resign.

39. Only his ceasing to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia will the economy recover, the Ringgit revalued up, and cost of living go down. Only after his removal can Malaysians stand tall again.

VERSI BM
1. Saya telah bekerja keras untuk menjadikan Najib Perdana Menteri Malaysia.

2. Tetapi sekarang saya mahu dia disingkirkan, meletak jawatan daripada menjadi Perdana Menteri.

3. Ia bukan hal peribadi.

4. Ia adalah kerana dia telah gagal teruk sebagai Perdana Menteri.

5. Daripada awal lagi saya perhatikan perkara-perkara salah yang dia lakukan.

6. Kita telah merdeka semenjak 1957. Kita sepatutnya dapat mentadbir negara kita sendiri. Sesungguhnya kita telah pun berbuat demikian selama beberapa dekad sebelum Najib, dan kita telah melakukannya dengan cemerlang.

7. Tetapi Najib melantik beberapa pegawai British sebagai penasihatnya.

8. Najib telah melantik ramai perunding asing untuk menasihatinya bagaimana mentadbir negara.

9. Orang-orang ini melibatkan kos berbilion-bilion ringgit tetapi nasihat mereka secara amnya tidak baik untuk negara ini. Mereka tidak tahu apa-apa tentang politik, ekonomi dan sensitivi Malaysia. Akibatnya pembangunan Malaysia lembab dan bangsa-bangsa berada dalam keadaan menentang satu sama lain.

10. Kerajaan di bawah pimpinan Najib menjadi sangat tidak popular. Walaupun memberi banyak wang kepada rakyat, mereka menolak beliau dalam Pilihan Raya 2013. Prestasi beliau lebih buruk daripada Abdullah, yang juga telah ditolak oleh rakyat. Orang Cina menolaknya sama sekali walaupun beliau mengisytiharkan dirinya sebagai saudara mereka.

11. Dia menimbulkan kemarahan kakitangan awam dengan menubuhkan Pemandu untuk mengambil alih tugas EPU. Kakitangan Pemandu yang bukannya pegawai Kerajaan telah dibayar gaji yang tinggi, jauh lebih tinggi mengatasi Skim Gaji Kerajaan. Begitu marah, sebilangan pejawat awam sebaik sahaja bersara mereka telah menyertai parti pembangkang dan bertanding sebagai calon pembangkang, sesuatu yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelum ini.

12. Pertumbuhan ekonomi jatuh di bawah paras pertumbuhan ekonomi Filipina dan Indonesia.

13. Mata wang telah susut dan harga saham susut dengan teruk mengakibatkan masalah untuk perniagaan, pengimport dan pengeksport. Kos sara hidup meningkat terutama selepas GST.

14. Kemudian datangnya pula skandal 1MDB. Suatu dana yang sama sekali tidak perlu telah diwujudkan yang akan dibiayai oleh pinjaman yang besar. Kerajaan telah memberi satu juta Ringgit sebagai modal tetapi 1MDB (1Malaysia Development Berhad) telah meminjam 42 bilion Ringgit daripada pasaran. Ia membayar faedah yang tinggi sebanyak 5.9% dan memberikan komisen 10% kepada Goldman Sachs. Kerajaan tidak pernah meminjam begitu banyak atau membayar kadar yang begitu tinggi itu.

15. 1MDB membeli loji kuasa elektrik pada harga lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran. Ia juga membeli/mengambilalih hutang piutang syarikat-syarikat janakuasa. Jumlah kos adalah 18 bilion Ringgit. 1MDB kehilangan begitu banyak wang sehingga ia tidak boleh membayar faedah ke atas pinjaman.

16. 1MDB membeli tanah Kerajaan pada 60 Ringgit kaki persegi sedangkan harga sebenarnya adalah lebih daripada RM3,000 kaki persegi. Dengan menilai semula tanah itu sebanyak 50 kali ganda, ia mendakwa asetnya adalah lebih besar daripada hutangnya. Ini adalah seperti menjual permit import yang didapati secara percuma daripada Kerajaan.

17. Kemudian 1MDB telah menyertai perniagaan yang mencurigakan dengan Petro Saudi sebagai rakan usaha sama. Ia membayar USD1 Bilion bagi saham 40 peratus miliknya itu. Enam bulan kemudian usaha sama ini telah dibubarkan. Akan tetapi USD1 Bilion itu bersama dengan USD700 juta yang lain telah ditukar menjadi pinjaman kepada Petro Saudi. Wang ini kini telah lesap.

18. Satu-satunya aset yang dipunyai oleh 1MDB sekarang adalah loji kuasa dan tanah di Kuala Lumpur. Lebih daripada RM20 Bilion daripada 42 Bilion ringgit itu tidak dapat dikesan atau dihitung.

19. Kemudian tiba-tiba Wall Street Journal melaporkan bahawa Najib mempunyai USD700 juta dalam akaun peribadinya di Bank Arab-Malaysia (bersamaan RM2.6 bilion pada masa itu).

20. Tidak ada PM Malaysia atau Presiden UMNO yang boleh mempunyai wang sebanyak itu. Semua sumbangan kepada UMNO biasanya diterima dan dibankkan oleh Bendahari UMNO. Semua aset diletakkan di bawah nama tiga pemegang amanah.

21. Tidak pernah dalam sejarah UMNO terdapat lebih daripada RM250 juta secara tunai. Semua aset lain adalah dalam bentuk saham, tanah dan bangunan. Presiden adalah bertanggungjawab untuk menyerahkan semua sumbangan kepada Bendahari untuk perbankan. Presiden tidak pernah menyimpan wang UMNO atau wang didermakan kepada UMNO, untuk pilihan raya misalnya, di dalam akaun peribadinya. Tiada peruntukan untuk akaun UMNO dikendalikan oleh Presiden.

22. Najib dan isterinya terkenal dengan gaya hidup yang mewah. Jelas sekali jutaan telah dibelanjakan untuk pertunangan dan pelbagai majlis perkahwinan di Malaysia dan Kazakhstan. Anak tiri Najib membelanjakan ratusan juta dolar membeli hartanah di London, New York dan California. Beliau juga membiayai pembikinan filem Hollywood, “The Wolf of Wall Street” dengan perbelanjaan melebihi USD100 juta.

23. Dengan gaji Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri, adalah mustahil baginya untuk membelanjakan jutaan ringgit bagi semua ini. Ada satu kenyataan oleh PMO yang mendakwa bahawa wang bagi harta-harta luar negara dan filem itu telah diwarisi. Adalah mustahil bagi Tun Razak, atau Haji Noah atau bapa Rosmah untuk memiliki dan mewariskan ratusan juta Ringgit. Malah mereka tidak dikenali sebagai jutawan pun. Adik beradik Najib menafikan dakwaan itu.

24. Jadi dari mana datangnya wang itu? Najib mendakwa 2.6 bilion Ringgit itu telah didermakan kepadanya oleh seorang Arab. Ini tidak masuk akal. Tiada siapa yang pernah memberikan wang sebanyak itu kepada sesiapa. Dan Najib tidak dapat membuktikan bahawa orang Arab itu telah memberinya wang.

25. Dan dengan itu sebuah pasukan petugas khas yang terdiri daripada Peguam Negara, Pesuruhjaya Pencegahan Rasuah, Gabenor Bank Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara telah ditubuhkan untuk menyiasat punca RM2.6 bilion berada dalam akaun peribadi Najib di Bank Arab-Malaysia.

26. Jawatankuasa Kira-Kira Dewan Rakyat juga sedang menyiasat apa yang berlaku kepada RM 42 bilion Ringgit yang dipinjam oleh 1MDB. Begitu juga Ketua Audit Negara.

27. Tiba-tiba Najib memecat Peguam Negara dengan mendakwa dia sakit. Peguam Negara menafikan beliau sakit. Tidak ada sijil oleh doktor membuktikan dia sakit. Najib tidak mempunyai hak untuk mendakwa bahawa Peguam Negara sedang sakit.

28. Pada masa yang sama, ketua Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah dikatakan telah pergi bercuti. Gabenor Bank Negara membisu. Kemudian dia menyatakan dia takut ditangkap.

29. Dua daripada ahli-ahli Kerajaan PAC dilantik Timbalan Menteri dan dua lagi diberi pekerjaan lain. Mereka tidak dapat meneruskan kerja-kerja mereka sebagai ahli PAC. PAC adalah tanpa seorang Pengerusi dan siasatan 1MDB telah berhenti.

30. Dua anggota Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah telah ditangkap, dibebaskan dan dipindahkan ke Pejabat Perdana Menteri. Selepas komplen dibuat mereka telah dipindahkan semula ke Suruhanjaya.

31. Penolong Ketua Cawangan Khas telah dipindahkan keluar. Beliau kemudian membuat kenyataan yang keras terhadap pemindahannya.

32. Orang yang bercakap mengenai 1MDB dan 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun Najib, atau melaporkan mengenainya telah ditangkap, pasport mereka dirampas dan diancam oleh polis dengan soal siasat. Ianya seolah-olah sebarang soalan mengenai 1MDB dan Najib 2.6 bilion merupakan tindakan untuk melemahkan demokrasi dan menjatuhkan Kerajaan yang dipilih dengan betul. Orang boleh ditahan sehingga 28 hari tanpa perbicaraan di bawah undang-undang baru yang bertujuan untuk mencegah tindakan keganasan. Bercakap tentang 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion kepunyaan Najib seolah-olah merupakan tindakan keganasan. Najib lupa bahawa beliau sendiri terlibat dalam penyingkiran pemimpin terdahulu yang juga dipilih secara demokrasi.

33. Kemudian datangnya sesuatu yang menggemparkan. Al Jazeera menayangkan kisah pembunuhan gadis Mongolia Altantuya. Adalah jelas daripada kisah itu bahawa Najib mempunyai kaitan dengan pembunuhan itu.

34. Ramai rakyat Malaysia tidak mahu mempercayainya. Tetapi orang di seluruh dunia mempercayai cerita itu. Ia telah menjadi satu skandal antarabangsa. Ia telah memalukan Malaysia. Di mana-mana sahaja sesiapa pergi, ada yang bertanya, “Apa yang telah berlaku kepada Malaysia”.

35. Di antara 1MDB, 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun peribadi Najib dan pembunuhan Altantuya, nama baik Malaysia benar-benar rosak. Tidak pernah sebelum ini, Malaysia menjadi begitu hina oleh Perdana Menterinya sendiri. Tidak pernah orang memandang rendah negara ini. Tidak pernah sebelum ini rakyat Malaysia begitu malu dengan negara mereka.

36. Najib telah membayar orang untuk menunjuk perasaan di jalan-jalan untuk menyokong beliau. Dengan sewenangnya beliau juga mengharamkan usaha orang-orang tunjuk perasaan bagi memecatnya.

37. Untuk mata wang dan ekonomi pulih, Najib mesti berhenti menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Rakyat Malaysia mesti menuntut penyingkiran Najib. Ianya sesuatu yang amat demokratik untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau. Tindakan yang diambil beliau untuk menahan seseorang untuk mengadakan perhimpunan untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau adalah apa yang tidak demokratik dan bercanggah dengan undang-undang negara ini.

38. Saya menyeru semua rakyat Malaysia untuk menuntut Najib membenarkan siasatan terhadapnya yang akan dijalankan oleh orang-orang bebas yang tidak dilantik olehnya. Najib mesti membenarkan proses undang-undang berjalan. Jika didapati bahawa dia telah melakukan kesalahan dia perlu didesak untuk
meletakkan jawatan.

39. Hanya dengan pengundurannya sebagai Perdana Menteri Malaysia barulah ekonomi akan pulih, nilai ringgit akan meningkat, dan kos sara hidup akan turun. Hanya selepas penyingkirannya rakyat Malaysia akan mampu berdiri semula.